MARATTO

article · Journal of Global Health

Setting research priorities for global pandemic preparedness: An international consensus and comparison with ChatGPT’s output

202413 citationsOpen accessStellenbosch University

Abstract

Priority setting processes based on human crowdsourcing - such as the CHNRI method - and the output provided by ChatGPT are both valuable, as they complement and strengthen each other. The priorities identified by ChatGPT were more grounded in theory, while those identified by CHNRI were guided by recent practical experiences. Addressing these priorities, along with improvements in health planning, equitable community-based interventions, and the capacity of primary health care, is vital for better pandemic preparedness and response in many settings.

Research topics

  • COVID-19 and healthcare impacts
  • Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
  • Adolescent and Pediatric Healthcare

Read the original research

This page summarises published work. The authoritative version sits with the publisher.

DOI: 10.7189/jogh.14.04054

Is something wrong with this record? Report it or request removal.

Discussion

Discuss this research

Have you built on this work, tried to replicate it, or seen it applied in practice? Share what you know. Verified researchers and MARATTO™ domain experts can open a discussion, and any member can reply. Contributions are reviewed before they appear.

No discussion yet. Open the first thread.