MARATTO

article · Zagazig University Medical Journal

Serum and Urinary Prostatic Cancer Antigen 3 as Diagnostic Biomarkers for Prostate Cancer

20241 citationOpen accessZagazig University

Abstract

Background: The Prostatic cancer antigen 3 (PCA3) is extensively over-expressed in the malignant prostatic tissues more than normal or benign adjacent ones. Clinical diagnosis and targeted therapy are two areas where this biomarker shows a promising value. The present work aimed to evaluate the role of serum and urinary PCA3 as a diagnostic marker in prostatic cancer cases in Zagazig University Hospitals.Subjects and methods: In a case-control study, we included 44 patients who were divided into two groups: 22 patients with benign prostatic hyperplasia as a control group and 22 patients with prostate cancer. Cases were subjected to full history taking, clinical evaluation, and determination of total Prostate-specific antigen (PSA), free PSA, serum, and urinary PCA3.Results: Both serum and urinary PCA3 were significantly higher in the cancer group than in the control group (P=0.007 and P<0.001, respectively). The best cutoff of serum PCA3 to diagnose prostate cancer is ≥5.985pg/ml with the area under curve 0.739, sensitivity 86.3%, specificity 54.5%, positive predictive value 65.5%, negative predictive value 80%, and overall accuracy 70.5% (p=0.007). The best cutoff of urinary PCA3 to diagnose cancer prostate is ≥9.775pg/ml with area under curve 0.965, sensitivity 95.5%, specificity 95.5%, positive predictive value 95.5%, negative predictive value 95.5% and overall accuracy 95.5% (p<0.001).Conclusion: When compared to PSA, urinary PCA3 had the better diagnostic specificity and sensitivity, making it a promising biomarker and noninvasive test for prostate cancer diagnosis. It could be used in diagnosis of PCA either alone or in combination with total PSA

Research topics

  • Prostate Cancer Treatment and Research
  • Cancer, Lipids, and Metabolism

Sustainable Development Goals

Read the original research

This page summarises published work. The authoritative version sits with the publisher.

DOI: 10.21608/zumj.2024.258419.3070

Is something wrong with this record? Report it or request removal.

Discussion

Discuss this research

Have you built on this work, tried to replicate it, or seen it applied in practice? Share what you know. Verified researchers and MARATTO™ domain experts can open a discussion, and any member can reply. Contributions are reviewed before they appear.

No discussion yet. Open the first thread.