MARATTO

article · Social Network Analysis and Mining

Sentiment analysis for code-mixed low-resource languages: a systematic review of approaches, techniques, applications, challenges, and future directions

Abstract

Abstract With the rapid proliferation of user-generated content across internet-based platforms, sentiment analysis has become an essential tool for understanding public opinion. However, sentiment analysis on code-mixed, low-resource languages presents significant challenges due to limited annotated data, linguistic complexity, and resource constraints. This systematic literature review (SLR) comprehensively examines recent developments in sentiment analysis for code-mixed and low-resource languages, with a focus on studies published between 2017 and 2025. The review investigates a wide range of approaches, including deep learning models, transfer learning strategies, and pre-trained language models, evaluating their effectiveness in low-resource and code-mixed contexts. Findings indicate that transfer learning and transformer-based architectures are increasingly preferred due to their superior performance and reduced reliance on large annotated datasets. Social media is identified as the dominant data source, followed by reviews from e-commerce and entertainment domains. Despite these advancements, significant challenges persist, including the scarcity of high-quality labeled data, high computational costs, and limited generalization across languages and domains. This review not only synthesizes current methodologies and applications but also proposes a conceptual framework for future research. It offers actionable insights for scholars seeking to develop efficient, scalable sentiment analysis systems tailored to code-mixed and low-resource language scenarios.

Research topics

  • Sentiment Analysis and Opinion Mining
  • Hate Speech and Cyberbullying Detection
  • Spam and Phishing Detection

Read the original research

This page summarises published work. The authoritative version sits with the publisher.

DOI: 10.1007/s13278-026-01588-2

Is something wrong with this record? Report it or request removal.

Discussion

Discuss this research

Have you built on this work, tried to replicate it, or seen it applied in practice? Share what you know. Verified researchers and MARATTO™ domain experts can open a discussion, and any member can reply. Contributions are reviewed before they appear.

No discussion yet. Open the first thread.