MARATTO

preprint

Semantic Similarity Relaxation and Approximation of Incomplete Queries Using LLMs Embedding to Topic Graph Mining

2024Open accessBenha University

Abstract

<title>Abstract</title> In recent years, the Resource Description Framework (RDF) has emerged as a pivotal technology for structuring and interlinking data on the web. RDF graphs typically have billions of labelled entities, and how to efficiently retrieve the needed information from an RDF KG for a given SPARQL query has recently drawn more attention. However, because RDF data is schema-free, it is very challenging for users to understand the underlying structure fully. Consequently, different graph fragments can represent the same information. Therefore, it is extremely challenging to create complex SPARQL queries that encompass all possible structures. Recently, researchers have started to use knowledge semantics to extend the query intention of a simplified query to get an approximate answer. In this paper, we present an efficient framework that allows access to the RDF repository even if users lack comprehensive knowledge of the underlying schema. Based on semantic similarity, we can get more answers that match the simple query. We propose a systematic method to mine RDF graphs into diverse semantically equivalent structure patterns (topic graphs). We use type similarity to construct these patterns, and then a large language model (LLM) embedding is adapted to these patterns to achieve semantic vectors of existing knowledge. Based on the knowledge semantics above, an approximate query is constructed to get the top-k semantic similarity result. Extensive testing using the DBpedia dataset and QALD-4 benchmark query has proven how effective and efficient our approach is.

Research topics

  • Graph Theory and Algorithms
  • Advanced Graph Neural Networks
  • Web Data Mining and Analysis

Read the original research

This page summarises published work. The authoritative version sits with the publisher.

DOI: 10.21203/rs.3.rs-4999649/v1

Is something wrong with this record? Report it or request removal.

Discussion

Discuss this research

Have you built on this work, tried to replicate it, or seen it applied in practice? Share what you know. Verified researchers and MARATTO™ domain experts can open a discussion, and any member can reply. Contributions are reviewed before they appear.

No discussion yet. Open the first thread.