MARATTO

article · American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene

Self-Rated Competence of Ugandan Healthcare Workers to Obtain Informed Consent for Autopsy

2024Open access

Abstract

We examined the self-rated competence of Ugandan healthcare workers (HCWs) in obtaining informed consent for autopsies, considering the challenges of low autopsy acceptance rates globally. In September and October 2023, we conducted a nationwide cross-sectional study of HCWs, who provided informed consent to participate and completed an online, self-administered questionnaire. Participants' self-rated competence in obtaining informed consent for autopsy was assessed through Likert scale questions. Knowledge and practices were also assessed. All scores were converted to percentages, with scores ≥80% indicating higher competence. We enrolled 216 HCWs (including 145 [67.1%] doctors), with a mean age of 31.6 ± 7.2 years. Overall, 55.6% (n = 120) had ever assisted in obtaining consent for autopsy, 43.6% (n = 100) had ever obtained consent for autopsy themselves, and 13.4% (n = 29) had ever attended training on obtaining consent for autopsy. The mean competency score was 59.8 ± 17.0% (perfect score, 100%), with 29 (13.4%) participants demonstrating high competence. Healthcare workers with adequate knowledge had higher competence scores (odds ratio [OR]: 15.0, 95% CI: 6.17-36.58, P <0.001). Compared with nurses/midwives, doctors had 73% lower odds of having a high competence score (adjusted OR: 0.27, 95% CI: 0.08-0.94, P = 0.040). Fewer than one in five Ugandan HCWs demonstrated high self-rated competence or possessed adequate knowledge regarding informed consent for autopsies, and only a few had received specialized training on how to obtain consent for an autopsy. Therefore, there is a pressing need for enhanced training and increased awareness among Ugandan HCWs in obtaining informed consent for autopsies.

Research topics

  • Autopsy Techniques and Outcomes
  • Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues
  • Healthcare cost, quality, practices

Read the original research

This page summarises published work. The authoritative version sits with the publisher.

DOI: 10.4269/ajtmh.23-0854

Is something wrong with this record? Report it or request removal.

Discussion

Discuss this research

Have you built on this work, tried to replicate it, or seen it applied in practice? Share what you know. Verified researchers and MARATTO™ domain experts can open a discussion, and any member can reply. Contributions are reviewed before they appear.

No discussion yet. Open the first thread.