MARATTO

article · Multicriteria Algorithms with Applications

Selecting Optimal Charcoal Company using Multi-Criteria Decision Making Methodology

20242 citationsOpen accessZagazig University

Abstract

A popular technique used in many industries to assist decision-makers in evaluating and selecting the best alternatives from a variety of accessible possibilities is multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM). This study proposed an MCDM methodology for selecting optimal charcoal from various options and criteria. Various criteria influence the selection problem, such as financial, safety, labour, power supply, production, and transportation. This study used the Combinative Distance Assessment (CODAS) method as an MCDM method to rank the alternatives and use the best one. This study used nine criteria and twenty alternatives. The requirements are divided into positive and negative criteria to compete for the positive and negative ideal solution using the CODAS method. The criteria weights are computed. The rank of alternatives is checked by using the sensitivity analysis. The results show the rank of other options is stable in different cases.

Research topics

  • Organizational and Employee Performance
  • Supply Chain Resilience and Risk Management
  • Islamic Finance and Banking Studies

Read the original research

This page summarises published work. The authoritative version sits with the publisher.

DOI: 10.61356/j.mawa.2024.311561

Is something wrong with this record? Report it or request removal.

Discussion

Discuss this research

Have you built on this work, tried to replicate it, or seen it applied in practice? Share what you know. Verified researchers and MARATTO™ domain experts can open a discussion, and any member can reply. Contributions are reviewed before they appear.

No discussion yet. Open the first thread.