article · DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals)
Lung cancer remains one of the leading causes of cancer-related mortality worldwide, often due to latestage diagnosis and the complexity of tumor localization in thoracic imaging. Accurate and automated segmentation of lung tumors from PET/CT images is essential for early diagnosis, treatment planning, and outcome monitoring. Manual segmentation is time-consuming and prone to observer variability, underscoring the need for reliable deep learning-based solutions. This study proposes an automated lung tumor segmentation framework using the SegNet architecture, a deep encoder-decoder convolutional neural network. A dataset of 1, 425PET/CT images, manually annotated by expert radiologists, was utilized. Data augmentation techniques were applied to improve generalization. SegNet was trained to perform pixel-wise binary classification, and its performance was benchmarked against the widely used U-Net model. Evaluation metrics included Accuracy, Recall, Dice coefficient, and Intersection over Union (IoU).The proposed SegNet model achieved strong segmentation performance across independent experiments. Average results were: Accuracy of 92.24% ± 1.42, Recall of 94.02% ± 1.287, Dice coefficient of 93.47% ± 1.4, and IoU of 93.03% ± 1.2. Compared to U-Net (Dice: 92.18% ± 1.081, IoU: 91.70% ± 1.287 ), SegNet demonstrated improved spatial boundary accuracy, particularly for tumors located near complex anatomical structures. Statistical tests confirmed the significance of the performance difference ( p < 0.05 ). The SegNet-based model provides accurate and robust segmentation of lung tumors in PET/CT images, outperforming U-Net under the same conditions. Its use of max-pooling indices enhances spatial precision, making it well-suited for clinical applications. Future work will explore 3D extensions, multi-class segmentation, and multi-center validation to enhance its applicability in real-world diagnostic workflows.
This page summarises published work. The authoritative version sits with the publisher.
DOI: 10.6180/jase.202607_30.008
Is something wrong with this record? Report it or request removal.
Discussion
Have you built on this work, tried to replicate it, or seen it applied in practice? Share what you know. Verified researchers and MARATTO™ domain experts can open a discussion, and any member can reply. Contributions are reviewed before they appear.
No discussion yet. Open the first thread.
New to MARATTO™? Create a free account.