article · Pharmacology Research & Perspectives
Gold nanoparticles (AuNPs) present with unique physicochemical features and potential for functionalization as anticancer agents. Three-dimensional spheroid models can be used to afford greater tissue representation due to their heterogeneous phenotype and complex molecular architecture. This study developed an A549 alveolar carcinoma spheroid model for cytotoxicity assessment and mechanistic evaluation of functionalized AuNPs. A549 spheroids were generated using an agarose micro-mold and were characterized (morphology, acid phosphatase activity, protein content) over 21 culturing days. The 72-h cytotoxicity of carboxyl-polyethylene glycol- (PCOOH-) and amine-polyethylene glycol- (PNH<sub>2</sub>-) functionalized AuNPs against Day 7 spheroids was assessed by determining spheroid morphology, acid phosphatase activity, protein content, caspase-3/7 activity, and cell cycle kinetics. Spheroids remained stable over the experimental period. Although the A549 spheroids' volume increased while remaining viable over the culturing period, structural integrity decreased from Day 14 onwards. The PCOOH-AuNPs lacked cytotoxicity at a maximum concentration of 1.2 × 10<sup>12</sup> nanoparticles/mL with no prominent alteration to the cellular processes investigated, while the PNH<sub>2</sub>-AuNPs (at a maximum of 4.5 × 10<sup>12</sup> nanoparticles/mL) displayed dose- and time-dependent cytotoxicity with associated loss of spheroid compactness, debris formation, DNA fragmentation, and a 75% reduction in acid phosphatase activity. Differentiation between cytotoxic and non-cytotoxic AuNPs was achieved, with preliminary elucidation of cytotoxicity endpoints. The PNH<sub>2</sub>-AuNPs promote cytotoxicity by modulating cellular kinetics while destabilizing the spheroid ultrastructure. The model serves as a proficient platform for more in-depth elucidation of NP cytotoxicity at the preclinical investigation phase.
This page summarises published work. The authoritative version sits with the publisher.
DOI: 10.1002/prp2.70051
Is something wrong with this record? Report it or request removal.
Discussion
Have you built on this work, tried to replicate it, or seen it applied in practice? Share what you know. Verified researchers and MARATTO™ domain experts can open a discussion, and any member can reply. Contributions are reviewed before they appear.
No discussion yet. Open the first thread.
New to MARATTO™? Create a free account.