MARATTO

article · The Journal of Applied Laboratory Medicine

SARS-CoV-2 Variants Genotyping and Diagnostic Performance of a 2-Genes Detection Assay

Abstract

Abstract Background The emergence of the COVID-19 pandemic resulted in the unprecedented expansion of molecular testing technologies. This study aimed at evaluating the performance of the FluoroType® SARS-CoV-2 plus assay for SARS-CoV-2 detection as well as describing the detection of SARS-CoV-2 variants using the FluoroType® SARS-CoV-2 varID Q kit. Methods The study utilized 679 archived nasopharyngeal samples. Analytical performance and the diagnostic performance of the FluoroType® SARS-CoV-2 plus assay were determined using 320 samples and reference material. Variants identification on the FluoroType® SARS-CoV-2 varID Q assay was performed on 359 samples. The study was approved by the Aga Khan University Hospital Institutional Review Board. Results The FluoroType® SARS-CoV-2 plus assay’s limit of detection was verified as 1.2 copies/µL. The repeatability SD and %CV were 2.45 and 9.8% while reproducibility had an SD and %CV of 1.39 and 5.68%, respectively, for the RdRP gene. The positive and negative percent agreement were determined to be 99.4% (95% CI; 98.1%–100%) and 99.4% (95% CI; 98.2%–100%) respectively. In the variants identification, samples from the original wave had no mutations identified while 12.3%, 49%, and more than 90% of the samples during the Alpha, Delta, and Omicron waves, respectively, had detectable mutations. Conclusions The FluoroType® SARS-CoV-2 plus assay demonstrated analytical performance comparable to the reference method with a diagnostic sensitivity and specificity of >99%. The FluoroType® SARS-CoV-2 varID Q assay achieved rapid detection of circulating variants.

Research topics

  • SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 Research
  • SARS-CoV-2 detection and testing
  • Viral gastroenteritis research and epidemiology

Sustainable Development Goals

Read the original research

This page summarises published work. The authoritative version sits with the publisher.

DOI: 10.1093/jalm/jfad127

Is something wrong with this record? Report it or request removal.

Discussion

Discuss this research

Have you built on this work, tried to replicate it, or seen it applied in practice? Share what you know. Verified researchers and MARATTO™ domain experts can open a discussion, and any member can reply. Contributions are reviewed before they appear.

No discussion yet. Open the first thread.