MARATTO

article · IEEE Access

Same-Subject-Modalities-Interactions: A Novel Framework for MRI and PET Multi-Modality Fusion for Alzheimer’s Disease Classification

202322 citationsOpen accessUniversity of Tunis El Manar

Abstract

Alzheimer’s disease is a growing concern, and neuroimaging techniques such as Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) and Positron Emission Tomography (PET) scans are widely used to classify AD patients. While MRI captures structural information and measures brain atrophy, PET shows functional changes associated with neurological disorders, and both modalities have been proven to be AD biomarkers. However, combining MRI and PET in the same test without considering their inherent structural differences can result in a loss of important information. To address this issue, this paper proposes a novel machine learning framework for combining MRI and PET modalities and a new set of interactions known as Same-Subject-Modalities-Interactions (SSMI) to extract complementary information and new insights. The SSMI relation is derived from MRI and PET and subjected to PCA to construct the SSMI set, which is then concatenated with the other sets. The best set of features is selected and used for classification using Ridg-Classifier. Freesurfer is used to extract measures from 183 ADNI subjects (69 in the AD group and 114 in the CN group), and different classifiers are performed with train-test-split, cross-validation, and validation-set from ADNI-2/GO. The results showed high accuracy, precision, specificity, recall, F1-score, and AUC, with values of 98.94%, 98.27%, 97.10%, 100%, 99.13 and 98.55%, respectively, from ADNI and 98.75%, 98.48%, 93.75%, 100.0%, 99.23%, 96.80% from ADNI2/Go. These results are higher than those achieved by single-modality classification tasks and state-of-the-art approaches. Furthermore, the regions selected by Ridge Classifier are shown to be highly related to Alzheimer’s disease biomarkers.

Research topics

  • Alzheimer's disease research and treatments
  • Brain Tumor Detection and Classification
  • Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research

Read the original research

This page summarises published work. The authoritative version sits with the publisher.

DOI: 10.1109/access.2023.3276722

Is something wrong with this record? Report it or request removal.

Discussion

Discuss this research

Have you built on this work, tried to replicate it, or seen it applied in practice? Share what you know. Verified researchers and MARATTO™ domain experts can open a discussion, and any member can reply. Contributions are reviewed before they appear.

No discussion yet. Open the first thread.