MARATTO

article · Cogent Social Sciences

Sacred trust and secular impact: an examination of the societal influence of religious institutions in Africa

Abstract

Does religion function primarily as a moral compass, a social identity, a political resource, or something else entirely? The limited philosophical conceptualisation of religious institutions and the recent research focus on trends in religious participation and belief in a deity render the debates on the (dis)confirmation of the secularisation thesis an unfinished business. The current research aims to (1) explore a broader conceptualisation of the sacredness of religious institutions and (2) examine the social, economic and political impact of religious institutions. We utilise the ninth wave of Afrobarometer survey data and generalised structural equation modelling (GSEM) to examine the secular trust-secular impact (ST-SI) model for Malawi, with a defined criterion for comparative analyses from Botswana and Seychelles. We find that religious institutions have a stronger influence on the social and political aspects of people’s lives in Malawi than in Botswana, where their influence is primarily evident in social spheres. On the other hand, we found that religious institutions significantly influence the economic aspects of people’s lives in Seychelles. Taken together, these cross-country patterns demonstrate that institutional religious influence does not decline uniformly with development but instead persists in differentiated, domain-specific forms. By shifting the focus from individual religiosity to institutional influence across societal domains, the study refines secularisation theory and shows how religion continues to shape society even in highly developed contexts.

Research topics

  • Religion, Society, and Development
  • Religion and Sociopolitical Dynamics in Nigeria
  • African history and culture analysis

Read the original research

This page summarises published work. The authoritative version sits with the publisher.

DOI: 10.1080/23311886.2026.2660391

Is something wrong with this record? Report it or request removal.

Discussion

Discuss this research

Have you built on this work, tried to replicate it, or seen it applied in practice? Share what you know. Verified researchers and MARATTO™ domain experts can open a discussion, and any member can reply. Contributions are reviewed before they appear.

No discussion yet. Open the first thread.