MARATTO

article · Cancers

RNA-seq Splicing Profile of the CDH1 Gene and Its Impact on the Clinical Pathogenicity Classification of CDH1 Variants: A Description of Alternative and Pathogenic Splicing Patterns

Abstract

Background/Objectives: CDH1 gene is widely studied, as pathogenic variants are involved in diffuse gastric cancers and lobular breast cancers. CDH1 genotype contributes to the management of clinical practice recommendations for cancer prevention. We proposed a qualitative and quantitative description of CDH1 alternative splicing profile on lymphoblastoid cell lines (LCLs). The aim of this description was to allow a comprehensive interpretation of the effect of variants of uncertain significance (VUS) on CDH1 splicing. Methods: We studied, using RNAseq, the splicing profile of 22 LCLs (untreated and treated with puromycin) with no pathogenic variant on CDH1 and evaluated the effect on CDH1 splicing of four VUS. Results: We highlighted a total of eleven alternative splicing events including four junctions starting from intron 2, defining novel isoforms of CDH1. We also identified an isoform causing the skip of exon 11 and leading to a disruption of the reading frame with high levels of expression on negative CDH1 control LCLs, confirmed by ddPCR. Splicing RNAseq results for CDH1 VUS: c.1008+1G>A and c.1936+5G>A showed complex splicing patterns but allowed their classification as pathogenic. We studied CDH1 VUS exon 4 to exon 11 duplication with RNA analysis combined with Bionano optical genome mapping. Depending on alternative splicing of proximal and distal exons 11 within the duplication, we identified four distinct transcripts, leading to truncated proteins, classifying the duplication as pathogenic. Conclusions:CDH1 has a complex alternative splicing profile characterized by a dynamic splicing of intron 2 making CDH1 a good candidate for a study using long-read RNAseq.

Research topics

  • RNA modifications and cancer
  • Cancer-related gene regulation
  • RNA Research and Splicing

Read the original research

This page summarises published work. The authoritative version sits with the publisher.

DOI: 10.3390/cancers17203320

Is something wrong with this record? Report it or request removal.

Discussion

Discuss this research

Have you built on this work, tried to replicate it, or seen it applied in practice? Share what you know. Verified researchers and MARATTO™ domain experts can open a discussion, and any member can reply. Contributions are reviewed before they appear.

No discussion yet. Open the first thread.