MARATTO

article · Cloud Computing and Data Science

Review on Authentication Algorithms in Cellular Communication Networks

20241 citationOpen accessUniversity of Benin

Abstract

Black market and third-party subscriber identification module (SIM) cards are often exploited by criminals, such as kidnappers, to perpetrate their nefarious activities through cellular network services while maintaining anonymity. Authentication algorithms in cellular networks are designed to ensure that only users with valid SIMs can access network services. However, vulnerabilities in these algorithms allow perpetrators to bypass security measures. This paper reviews authentication algorithms across different generations of cellular networks, including second generation (2G), third generation (3G), fourth generation (4G) and fifth generation (5G). It explains the cryptographic challenge-response mechanism fundamental to these systems and highlights the detailed authentication procedures for each network generation. The review compares these procedures in terms of computational and communication overheads and their resistance to various attacks. Furthermore, it identifies common vulnerabilities that enable perpetrators to exploit these systems while remaining anonymous. The analysis reveals that while advancements in network generations have introduced more robust cryptographic techniques, they also increase computational and communication overheads. Importantly, the authentication algorithms primarily authenticate SIM cards rather than users, leaving room for exploitation. This review offers insights for improving authentication algorithms by incorporating user-level authentication, enhancing security in existing and future network generations, including 6G and beyond.

Research topics

  • Telecommunications and Broadcasting Technologies
  • Advanced Authentication Protocols Security
  • Cultural Studies and Postmodernism

Read the original research

This page summarises published work. The authoritative version sits with the publisher.

DOI: 10.37256/ccds.6120255673

Is something wrong with this record? Report it or request removal.

Discussion

Discuss this research

Have you built on this work, tried to replicate it, or seen it applied in practice? Share what you know. Verified researchers and MARATTO™ domain experts can open a discussion, and any member can reply. Contributions are reviewed before they appear.

No discussion yet. Open the first thread.