MARATTO

peer review

Review of: "What Factors Influence the Punishment of Research Misconduct: Evidence from Hospitals in Mainland China"

2024Open accessZagazig University

Abstract

Potential competing interests: No potential competing interests to declare.1.The topic is relevant, and the title is appropriate.2. The abstract is clear and consistent with the main text.However, the objective of the research should be stated within the abstract.3. The introduction is well-written.The purpose, research hypothesis, and rationale are well-stated.4. Abbreviations should be mentioned the first time they appear in the text. 5.The methods section is well-written.However, in the statistical analysis section, you should mention the conduction of analysis of between-subjects effects and interactive effects and the analysis of simple effects.6.The results are clearly displayed.7.

Research topics

  • Academic integrity and plagiarism
  • Deception detection and forensic psychology

Sustainable Development Goals

Read the original research

This page summarises published work. The authoritative version sits with the publisher.

DOI: 10.32388/tqhtg2

Is something wrong with this record? Report it or request removal.

Discussion

Discuss this research

Have you built on this work, tried to replicate it, or seen it applied in practice? Share what you know. Verified researchers and MARATTO™ domain experts can open a discussion, and any member can reply. Contributions are reviewed before they appear.

No discussion yet. Open the first thread.