peer review
Potential competing interests: No potential competing interests to declare.The research is valuable and was written well.But some considerations are needed.1-The references need to be revised thoroughly, not ordered; some are missed and not written uniformly.2-There is no reference for the tested doses.Why did you choose these concentrations?On which basis? 3-You didn't mention the death rate of the mice.
This page summarises published work. The authoritative version sits with the publisher.
DOI: 10.32388/b5ssbo
Is something wrong with this record? Report it or request removal.
Discussion
Have you built on this work, tried to replicate it, or seen it applied in practice? Share what you know. Verified researchers and MARATTO™ domain experts can open a discussion, and any member can reply. Contributions are reviewed before they appear.
No discussion yet. Open the first thread.
New to MARATTO™? Create a free account.