peer review
The work is good, but however, there are some areas that need attention in order to make the work more robust.a.It is always very good to state hypotheses in a null form.e.g.Ho1: There is no relationship between sustainability disclosure and a company's liquidity.b.The topic is about checking how sustainability disclosure affects performance, right?If that is so, then, when stating the hypothesis, the independent variable must come before the dependent variable.c.The methodology used is not explicitly stated, State the research design; just state which research design was adopted, either ex post facto, longitudinal, time series, etc., and the sources of data, probably primary or secondary.d.
This page summarises published work. The authoritative version sits with the publisher.
DOI: 10.32388/srvi86
Is something wrong with this record? Report it or request removal.
Discussion
Have you built on this work, tried to replicate it, or seen it applied in practice? Share what you know. Verified researchers and MARATTO™ domain experts can open a discussion, and any member can reply. Contributions are reviewed before they appear.
No discussion yet. Open the first thread.
New to MARATTO™? Create a free account.
