article · Curationis
Background: Nursing students face significant academic and clinical stressors that can affect their psychological well-being. These challenges are intensified during extraordinary events, such as the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. Objectives: This study investigated psychological distress and resilience among junior (1st year – 2nd year) and senior (3rd year – 4th year) undergraduate nursing students exposed to a major stressor at two universities in the Western Cape, South Africa. Method: A survey was conducted among 589 nursing students during and after COVID-19. Most respondents were female (77.4%) and junior students (75.2%), with a mean age of 22.5 years (± 4.6). Data collection took place at University A (February 2021–March 2021) and University B (November 2021–February 2022). Measures include psychological distress (Kessler-10), resilience (Response to Stressful Experiences Scale) and fear of COVID-19 (Fear of COVID-19 Scale). Results: Overall, students reported mild psychological distress and fear of COVID-19, and high levels of resilience. Senior students experienced significantly higher psychological distress than juniors (p < 0.001), but lower fear of COVID-19 (p = 0.028). Resilience did not differ significantly between groups, with most students demonstrating high resilience. Conclusion: Nursing students showed strong resilience despite the added pandemic-related stressors. Elevated distress among seniors, however, highlights the need for targeted psychological support. Strengthening resilience within nursing education may prepare students to manage future crises and contribute to a sustainable, adaptable nursing workforce. Contribution: This study provides evidence on the psychological well-being of nursing students in South Africa during the COVID-19 pandemic. It emphasises the importance of resilience-building interventions within nursing curricula and institutional support systems to safeguard student health and professional readiness.
This page summarises published work. The authoritative version sits with the publisher.
DOI: 10.4102/curationis.v49i1.2845
Is something wrong with this record? Report it or request removal.
Discussion
Have you built on this work, tried to replicate it, or seen it applied in practice? Share what you know. Verified researchers and MARATTO™ domain experts can open a discussion, and any member can reply. Contributions are reviewed before they appear.
No discussion yet. Open the first thread.
New to MARATTO™? Create a free account.