MARATTO

article · Stereotactic and Functional Neurosurgery

Reoperation Rates and Risk Factors after Spinal Cord Stimulation Revision Surgery

2024Open accessAin Shams University

Abstract

Among patients who undergo SCS reoperation, a substantial portion requires additional revisions. Cervical lead placement may be associated with a higher risk of repeat revision surgery compared to thoracic lead positioning. Consideration of lead positioning in the decision to perform and undergo reoperation may therefore result in lower revision rates and improved clinical outcomes among SCS patients with MRs.

Research topics

  • Pain Management and Treatment
  • Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
  • Myofascial pain diagnosis and treatment

Read the original research

This page summarises published work. The authoritative version sits with the publisher.

DOI: 10.1159/000541445

Is something wrong with this record? Report it or request removal.

Discussion

Discuss this research

Have you built on this work, tried to replicate it, or seen it applied in practice? Share what you know. Verified researchers and MARATTO™ domain experts can open a discussion, and any member can reply. Contributions are reviewed before they appear.

No discussion yet. Open the first thread.