MARATTO

article · AIMS Mathematics

Reliability analysis of the Lindley distribution via unified hybrid censoring with applications in medical survival and biological lifetime data

20258 citationsOpen accessArish University

Abstract

Unified hybrid censored sampling results from the need to effectively evaluate survival data impacted by different censoring techniques, enabling researchers to use partial information and lower bias in parameter estimates. This study employs unified hybrid censored samples to examine the maximum likelihood and Bayesian estimation methods for unknown parameters of the Lindley distribution, encompassing the reliability function, hazard rate function, cumulative hazard function, and mean residual life. Initially, we estimate the model parameters via the maximum likelihood method. We also examine bootstrapped confidence intervals and asymptotic confidence intervals for unknown parameters of the Lindley distribution. We also derive the confidence interval for the mean residual life, the hazard rate function, the cumulative hazard function, and the reliability function. Moreover, using flexible gamma priors for parameters combined with a non-informative prior yields Bayes estimators based on the principles of squared error, linear exponential, and general entropy loss functions. Consequently, we identify the corresponding highest posterior density credible intervals for unknown parameters, the reliability function, the hazard rate function, the cumulative hazard function, and the mean residual lifetime. Using numerous criteria, Monte Carlo simulations help evaluate the accuracy of the given estimations. We also assess sampling techniques across different rival censoring systems, including bootstrap and censored samples. Ultimately, we investigated a medical data set to show the useful value of the suggested approaches. The numerical results confirm the efficiency of our proposed approaches.

Research topics

  • Statistical Distribution Estimation and Applications
  • Statistical Methods and Inference
  • Statistical Methods and Bayesian Inference

Read the original research

This page summarises published work. The authoritative version sits with the publisher.

DOI: 10.3934/math.2025670

Is something wrong with this record? Report it or request removal.

Discussion

Discuss this research

Have you built on this work, tried to replicate it, or seen it applied in practice? Share what you know. Verified researchers and MARATTO™ domain experts can open a discussion, and any member can reply. Contributions are reviewed before they appear.

No discussion yet. Open the first thread.