review · Journal of Cleaner Production
Approximately 312 billion m 3 of municipal wastewater is generated worldwide annually containing ∼16.6 million tonnes of nitrogen which could meet ∼17 % of the global agricultural demand. Nitrogen recovery from wastewater would thus be economically significant, improve security of supply for fertilizers, prevent eutrophication of water bodies, and curb the large carbon footprint of synthetic nitrogen fertilizer production. Currently, nitrogen recovery from wastewater is not a common practice and the conventional nitrogen removal process via microbial nitrification/denitrification causes nitrogen to be lost into the atmosphere. This review provides an overview of ammonium and nitrate recovery via adsorption technology from a techno-economic perspective. An adsorption process can be used in combination with other techniques (e.g., ammonia stripping, membrane separation, struvite precipitation, or microbial assimilation) as a pre-concentration method. The most studied adsorbents are zeolites, biochars, activated carbons, and ion-exchange resins where the highest reported adsorption capacities in a flow-through process aiming for nitrogen recovery are ∼80 mg/g for ammonium and ∼360 mg/g for nitrate. The few existing full-scale plants, economic assessments, and life-cycle analyses point out that adsorption-based nitrogen recovery can achieve lower costs, smaller environmental impact, and higher treatment efficiency than the status quo. Thus, adsorption technology could be an important part of the toolbox when shifting towards a circular economy of nitrogen. • Adsorption technology can be used in the separation and pre-concentration of N. • It can be combined with e.g. NH 3 stripping, membrane separation, or struvite precipitation. • Economic and sustainability analysis suggest practical feasibility. • The main obstacles are likely non-technical (e.g., lack of value chains).
This page summarises published work. The authoritative version sits with the publisher.
DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2025.145976
Is something wrong with this record? Report it or request removal.
Discussion
Have you built on this work, tried to replicate it, or seen it applied in practice? Share what you know. Verified researchers and MARATTO™ domain experts can open a discussion, and any member can reply. Contributions are reviewed before they appear.
No discussion yet. Open the first thread.
New to MARATTO™? Create a free account.