article · Journal of Environmental Radioactivity
Many households in gold-mining regions of northern Tanzania have limited access to safe and reliable drinking water and rely on surface water, groundwater, and locally caught fish as key drinking-water and dietary sources, yet the radiological safety of these sources remains uncertain. This study evaluated age-dependent radiological risks from ingestion of naturally occurring radionuclides ( 234 U, 238 U, 226 Ra, 210 Po, 210 Pb) in multiple water sources and in fish tissues (bones, gills and flesh) of African lungfish ( Protopterus aethiopicus ), Nile tilapia ( Oreochromis niloticus ) and African Catfish ( Clarias gariepinus ). Activity concentrations were determined by radiochemical separation followed by alpha spectrometry and gas-flow proportional counting. Annual effective dose (AED) and excess lifetime cancer risk (ELCR) were estimated using age-specific water and fish consumption rates. Groundwater, particularly from shallow wells, produced the highest exposures, with a maximum AED for a 5-year-old child, dominated by 234 U, exceeding both the World Health Organization (WHO) screening level (0.1 mSv/y) and the International Commission on Radiological Protection (ICRP) public dose reference level (1 mSv/y). Fish consumption was the dominant pathway, with African lungfish consistently yielding the highest AEDs, followed by Tilapia and Catfish. The dose contributions were dominated by 210 Pb (75% −96%) and 210 Po (4% - 25%), while 234 U, 238 U, and 226 Ra contributed <1%. The estimated ELCRs associated with consumption of all fish species, exceeded the USEPA acceptable risk range (10 −6 – 10 −4 ). Elevated 234 U/ 238 U activity ratios (>1) indicated preferential mobilisation of 234 U via alpha-recoil, while low 210 Po/ 210 Pb ratios (<1) confirmed 210 Pb predominance. These findings underscore the need for continued radiological monitoring and targeted mitigation to protect vulnerable communities.
This page summarises published work. The authoritative version sits with the publisher.
DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvrad.2026.108119
Is something wrong with this record? Report it or request removal.
Discussion
Have you built on this work, tried to replicate it, or seen it applied in practice? Share what you know. Verified researchers and MARATTO™ domain experts can open a discussion, and any member can reply. Contributions are reviewed before they appear.
No discussion yet. Open the first thread.
New to MARATTO™? Create a free account.