review
<title>Abstract</title> Background Autologous free-flap reconstruction has transformed reconstructive surgery, restoring form and function in complex head, neck, breast, and limb defects. Maintaining stable perfusion during surgery is essential, yet the choice of vasopressor remains controversial. Surgeons have long feared that α-adrenergic vasoconstriction might jeopardize microcirculation, despite increasing evidence to the contrary. Whether specific vasopressor classes differ in their impact on flap survival has remained uncertain. Methods We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis following PRISMA guidelines (PROSPERO-registered). Eligible randomized controlled trials and observational cohort studies compared perioperative phenylephrine (pure α-agonist) with mixed α/β-agonists (norepinephrine or ephedrine) in adult free-flap surgery. Primary outcomes were flap failure and surgical revision for microvascular compromise; secondary outcomes included thrombosis. Pooled estimates were calculated using random-effects models. Results Nine studies (two RCTs, seven cohorts) comprising 7,181 patients and 8,626 flaps were included. Overall flap failure was low (3%), but norepinephrine was associated with higher failure (6%) compared to phenylephrine (2%) and ephedrine (2%). Surgical revision occurred in 12% overall, with norepinephrine again higher (15%) versus phenylephrine (2%). Thrombosis occurred in 7% overall, most frequently with norepinephrine (11%). Sensitivity analyses confirmed the robustness of these findings, though heterogeneity was high and publication bias could not be excluded. Conclusions In contemporary free-flap surgery, vasopressors are not uniformly harmful—but choice may matter. Phenylephrine and ephedrine were associated with fewer surgical revisions and thrombotic events compared to norepinephrine. While absolute differences in flap failure were small, the higher complication rates with norepinephrine warrant caution, and agent selection should be individualized. Further randomized trials are needed to refine hemodynamic management strategies in microvascular reconstruction.
This page summarises published work. The authoritative version sits with the publisher.
DOI: 10.21203/rs.3.rs-7360899/v1
Is something wrong with this record? Report it or request removal.
Discussion
Have you built on this work, tried to replicate it, or seen it applied in practice? Share what you know. Verified researchers and MARATTO™ domain experts can open a discussion, and any member can reply. Contributions are reviewed before they appear.
No discussion yet. Open the first thread.
New to MARATTO™? Create a free account.