Psychosocial Impact of Occlusion Therapy in Children with Amblyopia: A Cross-Sectional Study of Child and Parent Perspectives

Abstract

Amblyopia is the most common cause of unilateral visual impairment in childhood. Occlusion therapy remains the gold standard for treatment as its psychosocial and functional consequences may affect both children and their parents, potentially compromising treatment adherence. This cross-sectional study included 36 children (aged 3–9 years) undergoing occlusion therapy for amblyopia and 18 parents who completed a mirrored version of the same questionnaire. Each instrument consisted of 18 items distributed across three domains: Psychosocial (Q1–Q6), Daily and School Activities (Q7–Q12), and Physical and Treatment Acceptance (Q13–Q18). Responses were coded on 0–3 or 0–1 scales, and total scores ranged from 0 to 26, with higher scores reflecting greater psychosocial impact. The mean total score reported by children was 15.3 ± 2.5 (range 10–22), compared to 16 ± 2.7 (range 10–21) for parents. No significant difference was found between the two groups (p = 0.31), indicating a generally consistent perception of treatment impact. Among children, girls (15.5 ± 2.4) scored slightly higher than boys (15 ± 2.5) (p = 0.51). Among parents, mothers (17 ± 2.5) reported significantly greater perceived impact than fathers (14 ± 3.0) (p = 0.03). Age-based comparison revealed no significant differences between age groups (3–4, 5–6, and 7–9 years; F = 0.14; p = 0.87), although younger children (3–6 years) showed slightly higher psychosocial scores than older ones (7–9 years) (p = 0.75). Occlusion therapy exerts a moderate psychosocial impact on amblyopic children, affecting emotional well-being, school performance, and treatment acceptance. While parents generally recognize the burden of therapy, mothers perceive it more strongly than fathers, and younger children appear slightly more emotionally affected. These findings emphasize the importance of including both child self-reports and parental perspectives in clinical assessments and support the need for psychological and educational interventions to improve comfort and adherence during treatment.