MARATTO

article · Paliva

Progress towards the standardization of test parameters and protocols for evaluating densified fuel products

20242 citationsOpen accessUniversity of South Africa

Abstract

Densification technologies used in managing biomass and coal fines to produce fuel briquettes or pellets are gaining rapid acceptance and application due to the widespread uptake of renewable energy. This has resulted in the mushrooming of many standard and non-standard evaluation tests for densified solid fuels in this industry. These tests are sometimes inconsistently applied especially if the available options for evaluation, underlying assumptions and principles of the test methods chosen are misunderstood. A critical review of the fuel briquettes evaluation tests to understand their relevance, strengths and limitations is necessary to advance public and research knowledge. This study investigated current methods of standardization to identify best practices, inconsistencies, trends and gaps in the application of fuel briquettes testing protocols. Procedures for evaluating combustion or thermal properties include calorific value, burn rate, open air combustion test and water boiling test; ignition time; after-glow test; specific fuel combustion or thermal efficiency were discussed. Physical and chemical property evaluations involved densities and related ratios, proximate and ultimate analyses. Equally important are mechanical parameters frequently informed by tensile/compressive strength, impact resistance, friability and water resistance. As renewable densified fuels gain more global popularity, it is critical to have a uniform standard of evaluating their quality.

Research topics

  • Nuclear reactor physics and engineering
  • Nuclear Materials and Properties
  • Nuclear and radioactivity studies

Read the original research

This page summarises published work. The authoritative version sits with the publisher.

DOI: 10.35933/paliva.2024.01.03

Is something wrong with this record? Report it or request removal.

Discussion

Discuss this research

Have you built on this work, tried to replicate it, or seen it applied in practice? Share what you know. Verified researchers and MARATTO™ domain experts can open a discussion, and any member can reply. Contributions are reviewed before they appear.

No discussion yet. Open the first thread.