MARATTO

article · Lara D. Veeken

Prognostic value of quantifying vascular inflammation through ultrasound in patients with giant cell arteritis: the MAGiCUS study

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To assess the prognostic value of ultrasound-based quantification of vascular inflammation for predicting relapses in giant cell arteritis (GCA). METHODS: The Monitoring Activity of GCA through UltraSound (MAGiCUS) project is an international, multicentre, prospective, observational study including newly diagnosed GCA patients. Ultrasound of temporal and axillary arteries was conducted at baseline, 1, 3, 6 and 12 months. Vascular inflammation was quantified using the OMERACT GCA Ultrasonographic Score (OGUS). The primary outcome was the occurrence of the first clinical relapse between 6 and 12 months. RESULTS: Among 156 GCA patients from 19 centres, 31 (19.9%) experienced a relapse. In patients without a relapse, OGUS was significantly lower at all follow-up visits than baseline (-0.15 to -0.35). Baseline OGUS was significantly higher in relapsing patients (1.58 vs 1.16, P < 0.001). In multivariate analysis, an increase in 0.1 units in baseline OGUS was associated with relapse (odds ratio [OR] 1.19; 95% CI: 1.08, 1.34). This association remained significant for 0.1 increases in OGUS at 1 month (OR 1.37; 95% CI: 1.17, 1.66) and at 3 months (OR 1.51; 95% CI: 1.20, 1.98). The areas under the receiver operating characteristic curve for predicting relapse were 0.70 (95% CI: 0.58, 0.80) for baseline OGUS, 0.74 (95% CI: 0.60, 0.85) at 1 month, and 0.67 (95% CI: 0.56, 0.78) at 3 months. CONCLUSION: Ultrasound-based quantification of vascular inflammation has prognostic value for predicting relapses during follow-up in GCA. Higher baseline, 1-month and 3-months OGUS are associated with an increased probability of clinical relapse.

Research topics

  • Vasculitis and related conditions
  • Peripheral Artery Disease Management
  • Pregnancy and Medication Impact

Sustainable Development Goals

Read the original research

This page summarises published work. The authoritative version sits with the publisher.

DOI: 10.1093/rheumatology/keag341

Is something wrong with this record? Report it or request removal.

Discussion

Discuss this research

Have you built on this work, tried to replicate it, or seen it applied in practice? Share what you know. Verified researchers and MARATTO™ domain experts can open a discussion, and any member can reply. Contributions are reviewed before they appear.

No discussion yet. Open the first thread.