article · Journal of Childhood Education & Society
This paper aims to increase understanding of the professional development opportunities available to support the transformative capacity-building of early years practitioners. The context of this study was South Africa’s underprivileged Motheo district municipalities in the Free State province. The convergent mixed-methods design facilitated the collection of both quantitative and qualitative data. The sample size was n = 211; the participants were recruited through convenience sampling. The researcher tested two hypotheses to determine whether significant relationships existed between educational qualifications and years of teaching experience, and whether early childhood practitioners were aware of professional development opportunities available to them. Qualitative data were analysed thematically, and SPSS Version 25 was used for quantitative data analysis. Quantitative and qualitative data reveal that the practitioners were aware of professional development opportunities, though they did not take them up. Hypothesis testing revealed that the professional development opportunities available to practitioners were independent of their education qualifications and years of experience. The practitioners who participated in the research study seemed underprepared to deliver quality early childhood education services. This situation could change if they participate in relevant professional development opportunities.
This page summarises published work. The authoritative version sits with the publisher.
DOI: 10.37291/jces.720
Is something wrong with this record? Report it or request removal.
Discussion
Have you built on this work, tried to replicate it, or seen it applied in practice? Share what you know. Verified researchers and MARATTO™ domain experts can open a discussion, and any member can reply. Contributions are reviewed before they appear.
No discussion yet. Open the first thread.
New to MARATTO™? Create a free account.