MARATTO

review · Frontiers in Reproductive Health

Prevalence of sexual coercion and associated factors among adolescents and young adults in Africa: a systematic review and meta-analysis

20253 citationsOpen accessLagos University Teaching Hospital

Abstract

Introduction: Sexual coercion is a major public health and human rights concern, yet its burden among African adolescents and young adults remains poorly synthesized. This review aimed to estimate the prevalence of sexual coercion in this population and examine variations by gender, setting, and region. Methods: We systematically searched Web of Science, Scopus, MEDLINE/PubMed, and CINAHL for studies published between January 2000 and June 2025. Two reviewers independently screened, extracted, and appraised eligible studies. A narrative synthesis was integrated with a random-effects meta-analysis due to anticipated high heterogeneity to derive pooled prevalence estimates and conduct subgroup analyses. Results: Thirty-three studies involving 63,934 participants from 14 African countries were included. The pooled prevalence of sexual coercion was 20% (95% CI: 17%-23%). Females reported higher prevalence (23%) than males (19%). School-based studies showed greater prevalence (26%) compared with community-based studies (16%). Discussion: Sexual coercion remains a major public health and human rights concern among African adolescents, particularly school-going females. Strengthening school- and community-based programs that integrate comprehensive sexuality education on consent, negotiation, and gender equality is essential. Developing a standardized, context-sensitive tool for measuring sexual coercion will also enhance evidence quality and policy response. Systematic Review Registration: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/view/CRD420251067378, PROSPERO CRD420251067378.

Research topics

  • Sexual Assault and Victimization Studies
  • Adolescent Sexual and Reproductive Health
  • Child Abuse and Trauma

Read the original research

This page summarises published work. The authoritative version sits with the publisher.

DOI: 10.3389/frph.2025.1697868

Is something wrong with this record? Report it or request removal.

Discussion

Discuss this research

Have you built on this work, tried to replicate it, or seen it applied in practice? Share what you know. Verified researchers and MARATTO™ domain experts can open a discussion, and any member can reply. Contributions are reviewed before they appear.

No discussion yet. Open the first thread.