MARATTO

article · Sohag Medical Journal

Prediction of Difficult Biliary Cannulation During ERCP for Common Bile Duct Stones

2024Open accessSohag University

Abstract

Background: Common bile duct stones (CBDS) represent a widespread problem, and the commonly used approach for this issue is endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP). Nevertheless, the difficult biliary cannulation (DBC) throughout ERCP for biliary duct stones continues to pose a considerable obstacle, hence elevating the likelihood of post-ERCP pancreatitis (PEP) and other unfavorable occurrences. This study aimed to recognize pre-procedural aspects that can expect DBC during ERCP for CBDS, thereby facilitating appropriate preventive measures and optimizing patient outcomes.Methods: This prospective cohort study involved 100 participants aged ≥ 18 years with CBDS undergoing ERCP. DBC is failing to access the papilla after five attempts, spending over five minutes attempting cannulation after initially contacting the papilla, and encountering unwanted cannulation or opacification of the pancreatic duct on more than one occasion.Results: DBC was present in 43% of the patients. Distal biliary stricture (odds ratio (OR) 4.33, p=0.012), interdiverticular papilla (OR 6.27, p=0.027), attempted stone removal (OR 6.13, p=0.018), precut sphincterotomy (OR 11.121, p=0.036), prophylactic pancreatic stent placement (OR 10.645, p=0.005), AST (OR 0.903, p=0.003), direct bilirubin (OR 288.94, p=0.006), uric acid (OR 1.557, p=0.031), C-reactive protein (OR 2.268, p<0.001), triglycerides (OR 1.034, p<0.001), and glucose (OR 1.120, p<0.001) were independent predictors for DBC.Conclusions: The incidence of DBC in patients was 43%. Several factors that could predict DBC during ERCP for CBDS patients, including anatomical, procedural, and biochemical parameters.

Research topics

  • Gallbladder and Bile Duct Disorders
  • Pediatric Hepatobiliary Diseases and Treatments
  • Biliary and Gastrointestinal Fistulas

Sustainable Development Goals

Read the original research

This page summarises published work. The authoritative version sits with the publisher.

DOI: 10.21608/smj.2024.323729.1500

Is something wrong with this record? Report it or request removal.

Discussion

Discuss this research

Have you built on this work, tried to replicate it, or seen it applied in practice? Share what you know. Verified researchers and MARATTO™ domain experts can open a discussion, and any member can reply. Contributions are reviewed before they appear.

No discussion yet. Open the first thread.