Precision comparison for Different GNSS PPP solution using online services and open-source software processing

Abstract

In order to properly post-process data from the Global Navigation Satellite System, it is crucial to evaluate the dependability by means of online free processing tools because the development of GNSS offers satellite navigation consumers around the globe promising benefits. The purpose of the study is to assess the precision of several online processing tools, including GSIPOST, AUSPOS, IBGE, Magic GNSS, CSRS-PPP, and open-source software. Three stations' worth of RINEX 2 data were subjected to field observations utilising GNSS observations from IGS, with an observation time of 30 seconds. After that, both online and open-source software was used to analyze the collected data, using GPS and GPS and GLONASS. The relative differences and accuracy of the coordinates generated by each software were then assessed by comparison with those acquired from reference stations. coordinates in the ITRF14 standard for the X, Y, and Z directions. Online GNSS processing services don't require GNSS data processing skills and are easy to use, and provide more accurate results for engineering and geodetic uses. RINEX 3 data must be checked for better resolution.