MARATTO

article · Endocrine Research

Pre- and Post-treatment Serum BAFF Levels and BAFF Gene Polymorphisms in Patients with Graves’ Disease

Abstract

Background B cell activating factor (BAFF), a crucial factor for B cell survival and differentiation, has been linked to several autoimmune conditions. The aim of this study was to evaluate the association of BAFF gene’s polymorphisms with its serum levels and to assess their effect on Graves’ disease (GD) susceptibility and presentation.Methods Sixty-two GD patients and 152 healthy controls have been enrolled to investigate BAFF rs9514827 (−2841 T/C), rs1041569 (−2701 T/A) and rs9514828 (−871 C/T) gene’s polymorphism by PCR-RFLP and serum BAFF level’s kinetics under medical treatment by ELISA.Results Median serum BAFF level at baseline was significantly higher in GD patients (841.7 pg/ml [685.23–1058.32]) comparatively to controls (495.75 pg/ml [383.17–595.7]), p = 7.29 E-25. A ROC curve was used to assess BAFF performances in GD diagnosis and revealed an AUC of 94.9% [0.919–0.979], p = 7.29 E-25. At a cutoff value of 654.9 pg/ml of BAFF at baseline, the sensitivity and the specificity were, respectively, 83.9% and 90.8%. BAFF level was significantly increased in smoking patients (1079.55 pg/ml [875.35–1203]) comparatively to nonsmokers (746.95 pg/ml [643.2–915.7]), p = 3.1 E-5. While −2841 T/C and −2701 T/A genotypes and alleles frequencies were similar between patients and controls, the −871*T allele was significantly more prevalent in patients (0.613) than in controls (0.477); p = .01, OR [95% CI] = 1.73 [1.13–2.65]. The three studied polymorphisms were not associated with serum BAFF level at baseline.Conclusion Serum BAFF level is significantly increased in GD especially in smoking patients. rs9514828 − 871*T allele might be a susceptibility variant for GD.

Research topics

  • Diabetes and associated disorders
  • T-cell and B-cell Immunology
  • Thyroid Disorders and Treatments

Sustainable Development Goals

Read the original research

This page summarises published work. The authoritative version sits with the publisher.

DOI: 10.1080/07435800.2023.2167087

Is something wrong with this record? Report it or request removal.

Discussion

Discuss this research

Have you built on this work, tried to replicate it, or seen it applied in practice? Share what you know. Verified researchers and MARATTO™ domain experts can open a discussion, and any member can reply. Contributions are reviewed before they appear.

No discussion yet. Open the first thread.