MARATTO

review · International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics

Post‐publication research integrity concerns in randomized clinical trials: A scoping review of the literature

20245 citationsOpen accessSohag University

Abstract

Various research integrity domains and issues covering post-publication aspects of RCT integrity were captured and gaps were identified, mostly related with the necessary implications for all stakeholders to improve research transparency. There is an urgent need for a multistakeholder consensus towards creating specific statements for addressing post-publication integrity concerns in RCTs.

Research topics

  • Ethics in Clinical Research
  • Academic integrity and plagiarism
  • Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education

Read the original research

This page summarises published work. The authoritative version sits with the publisher.

DOI: 10.1002/ijgo.15488

Is something wrong with this record? Report it or request removal.

Discussion

Discuss this research

Have you built on this work, tried to replicate it, or seen it applied in practice? Share what you know. Verified researchers and MARATTO™ domain experts can open a discussion, and any member can reply. Contributions are reviewed before they appear.

No discussion yet. Open the first thread.