MARATTO

article · SVU-International Journal of Medical Sciences

Post-COVID-19 Electrophysiological, Cognitive and Psychological Assessment in a Sample of Healthcare Providers in Qena Governorate

Abstract

Background: The COVID-19 outbreak threatens society globally. Stress and depression are common. Electrophysiological, cognitive, psychological, and covid-19 disease assessmentsObjectives: Assessment relationship between cognition, psychological and covid-19 disease.Patients and methods: 30 patients had covid-19-positive PCR, and 25 healthy controls matched for Sex and Age. Electroencephalogram (EEG) assessed electrophysiological changes, cognitive functions were assessed using Trail Making Test (parts A and B) and Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA), depression and anxiety were assessed using HAM D & A.Results: No EEG changes after 1 month between cases and controls (p-value=0.099) and after 3 months (p-value=0.293).Follow, neither cases nor controls has EEG changes(p-value=0.630,1.0).Cases and controls differ in trail A(p-value=0.003) after month while after 3 months(p-value=0.123). In the cases, trail A after 1 month is different from trail A after 3 months(p-value=0.001). In controls, trail A after 1 month and 3 months is identical(p-value=0.428). Trail B shows no significant difference between cases and controls after 1 and 3 months(p-value=0.170,0.428)Cases and controls differ in 1-month MoCA(p-value=0.001). Cases and controls have similar MoCA after 3 months (p-value=0.917). Repeat MoCA after 3 months differs statistically(p-value=0.001,0.896). HAM-A statistically differs between cases and controls after 1 month(p-value=0.005), but not after 3 months(p-value=0.133). Cases and controls differ for HAM A within 1 month and after 3 months (p-value=0.001,0.048). After 1 month, HAM D cases and controls differ (p-value=0.249,0.753).follow cases and controls identical (p-value=0.006,0.188)Conclusion: Our study shows that SARS-CoV-2 impairs healthcare workers cognition and psyche.

Research topics

  • Health and Well-being Studies

Read the original research

This page summarises published work. The authoritative version sits with the publisher.

DOI: 10.21608/svuijm.2023.189473.1506

Is something wrong with this record? Report it or request removal.

Discussion

Discuss this research

Have you built on this work, tried to replicate it, or seen it applied in practice? Share what you know. Verified researchers and MARATTO™ domain experts can open a discussion, and any member can reply. Contributions are reviewed before they appear.

No discussion yet. Open the first thread.