MARATTO

article · British and Irish Orthoptic Journal

Pilot Evaluation of a Web Application for Amblyopia Risk Screening Integrating Parent-Reported Factors with AI-Assisted Strabismus Detection

2026Open accessIbn Tofail University

Abstract

Background: Amblyopia is the most common cause of visual impairment in children, and early detection is essential, yet screening remains limited in many settings, especially where access to eye-care specialists is scarce. Objective: To evaluate the accuracy of a web-based screening tool that combines parent-reported risk factors with AI-assisted strabismus detection for identifying children at risk of amblyopia. Methods: This pilot study included 105 children aged 3-10 years attending a public hospital in Morocco for their first ophthalmological evaluation. Parents completed an online screening tool consisting of eight validated amblyopia risk-factor questions and an automated strabismus analysis based on a frontal smartphone photograph. The AI module combined geometric measurements of pupil-nasal root symmetry with convolutional neural network (CNN) features such as corneal light reflex and gaze vector orientation. Each child received a total score (0-9), stratified into high-risk (6-9), moderate-risk (3-6), or low-risk (0-3) categories. A comprehensive ophthalmological examination, performed by a clinician blinded to the application results, served as the reference standard. Results: Of the 105 children screened, 32 were classified as high-risk, 62 as moderate-risk, and 11 as low-risk. The tool demonstrated perfect agreement in the high-risk category, with all 32 high-risk children clinically confirmed to have amblyopia (PPV = 100%). In the moderate-risk group, 30 of the 62 children were clinically confirmed (PPV = 48.4%). No child in the low-risk group had amblyopia (NPV = 100%). The AI-assisted strabismus module showed strong predictive accuracy in the high-risk category (96.9% confirmation). Statistical analyses showed no significant differences in diagnostic performance across age, gender, or urban/rural subgroups (p > 0.05). Conclusions: The hybrid screening tool reliably identified children at high risk for amblyopia with complete concordance with a blinded clinical diagnosis, while safely excluding low-risk children. Although moderate-risk scores require cautious interpretation and clinical follow-up, this approach offers a low-cost, accessible, and scalable solution for paediatric vision screenings in resource-limited settings. Further large-scale community-based studies are warranted to validate generalisability.

Research topics

  • Ophthalmology and Visual Impairment Studies
  • Retinopathy of Prematurity Studies
  • Retinal Imaging and Analysis

Read the original research

This page summarises published work. The authoritative version sits with the publisher.

DOI: 10.22599/bioj.493

Is something wrong with this record? Report it or request removal.

Discussion

Discuss this research

Have you built on this work, tried to replicate it, or seen it applied in practice? Share what you know. Verified researchers and MARATTO™ domain experts can open a discussion, and any member can reply. Contributions are reviewed before they appear.

No discussion yet. Open the first thread.