article · The Egyptian Journal of Medical Microbiology
Background: Carbapenems are β-lactam antibiotics, which are regarded as one of the final options to treat severe infections resulting from multidrug-resistant organisms. Carbapenem resistance is mostly caused by carbapenemases, which are enzymes that break down this kind of β-lactam antibiotic. It can also occur through non-enzymatic processes such as efflux or changes in porin structure when AmpC or extended-spectrum β-lactamases (ESBL) are present. Carbapenemase-mediated resistance poses a far greater threat. Objectives: The aim of the study was to detect the underlying mechanisms of resistance of carbapenem resistant gram negative bacteria by phenotypic detection (lateral flow immunoassay) directly from positive blood cultures& genotypic detection (Conventional PCR). Methodology: This research was performed on clinical isolates of 25 positive blood cultures of carbapenem resistant Gram -ve bacteria from pediatric cases at Beni-Suef University Hospital. The isolates underwent identification & antimicrobial susceptibility testing by means of VITEK 2 compact system. We assessed a rapid lateral flow immunoassay (LFIA) directly on positive blood culture bottles for carbapenemase genes (OXA-48, KPC, NDM, VIM, and IMP) & compared outcomes with those obtained utilizing conventional polymerase chain reaction (PCR) techniques. Results: PCR test presented that OXA-48 was the most predominant genotype (96%), and the least prevalent was IMP (56%). We evaluated the results of the lateral flow immunoassay and found that the sensitivity of each type was in the range of 71.4%–100% and the specificity of each type was from 0%–90.9% in comparison with PCR as the gold standard. Conclusion: The lateral flow immunoassay is an effective & efficient phenotypic test for quickly identifying carbapenemase-generating isolates straight from blood culture bottles. It may also be utilized as a point-of-care test.
This page summarises published work. The authoritative version sits with the publisher.
DOI: 10.21608/ejmm.2024.298713.1271
Is something wrong with this record? Report it or request removal.
Discussion
Have you built on this work, tried to replicate it, or seen it applied in practice? Share what you know. Verified researchers and MARATTO™ domain experts can open a discussion, and any member can reply. Contributions are reviewed before they appear.
No discussion yet. Open the first thread.
New to MARATTO™? Create a free account.