MARATTO

article · Scientific Reports

Petrography and physical-mechanical evaluation of mafic-ultramafic rocks from Atud-Um Khasila, Egypt for dimension stone

2026Open accessAl-Azhar University

Abstract

This study investigates the petrography, physical, and mechanical properties of mafic-ultramafic rocks from the Atud-Um Khasila region in Egypt's Central Eastern Desert for dimension-stone applications. Eighteen representative samples of metagabbro, olivine gabbro, and serpentinite were analyzed using integrated petrographic and geotechnical methods. Standard ASTM and EN procedures were utilized to determine bulk density, water absorption, apparent porosity, and uniaxial compressive strength (UCS). Additionally, serpentinite samples were evaluated for durability against salt crystallization and thermal shock. Petrographic analysis reveals that gabbroic rocks (metagabbro and olivine gabbro) comprise plagioclase, amphibole, pyroxene, and olivine, forming interlocking textures that may contribute to their strength. Metagabbro demonstrated high strength (74.6 MPa), low porosity (0.24%), and minimal water absorption (0.08%). Olivine gabbro also performed well, with a strength (76.8 MPa), a porosity (0.29%), and water absorption (0.11%). In contrast, serpentinites, mostly made up of antigorite, talc, and carbonate veins, showed lower strength (67.3 MPa) due to alteration but had weight losses below 1% during testing. Overall, gabbroic rocks are appropriate for dimension stone applications, while serpentinite does not meet ASTM standards. This study demonstrates that the mineralogy and texture strongly influence rock performance, emphasizing the importance of combined petrographic and geotechnical assessments in evaluating stone resources.

Research topics

  • Building materials and conservation
  • CO2 Sequestration and Geologic Interactions
  • Recycling and utilization of industrial and municipal waste in materials production

Read the original research

This page summarises published work. The authoritative version sits with the publisher.

DOI: 10.1038/s41598-026-44938-y

Is something wrong with this record? Report it or request removal.

Discussion

Discuss this research

Have you built on this work, tried to replicate it, or seen it applied in practice? Share what you know. Verified researchers and MARATTO™ domain experts can open a discussion, and any member can reply. Contributions are reviewed before they appear.

No discussion yet. Open the first thread.