article · QJM
Abstract Background One of the main complications of spinal anesthesia is post spinal hypotension. And since noninvasive hemodynamic & blood pressure monitoring are the standards in most surgical procedures, ensuring best & safest monitoring standards has been of utmost importance. The use of plethysmography in anesthesia monitoring has become one of the essential tools in any anesthetic procedures. However, its varying interpretations & usages haven't been explored to the fullest. Objective To assess predictability of baseline peripheral perfusion index to Post spinal hypotension in patients undergoing elective lower abdomino-pelvic surgeries. Methods This Prospective Observational study was conducted in Ain Shams University Hospitals’ operating rooms. And was conducted over a period of 6 months after approval of ethical committee of Faculty of Medicine, Ain Shams University, All patients undergoing elective lower abdominopelvic surgeries at El-demerdash Hospital of Surgery during the study period. Surgeries include inguinal / inguinoscrotal hernia repair, paraumbilical hernia repair, lower laparotomies, transurethral resection of bladder tumor, simple gynecological procedures. Results This study showed that Perfusion index can be used as a predictor for hypotension in patients undergoing elective lower abdominopelvic surgeries under spinal anesthesia. Patients with baseline PI > 0.9 are at greater risk of developing hypotension after spinal anesthesia when compared with those with baseline PI ≤ 0.9. Hence, peripheral perfusion index usage can be recommended in this regard. Conclusion This study concluded that Perfusion index can be used as a predictor for hypotension in patients undergoing elective lower abdominopelvic surgeries under spinal anesthesia. Patients with baseline PPI >0.9 are at greater risk of developing hypotension after spinal anesthesia when compared with those with baseline PPI ≤0.9 .Hence, peripheral perfusion index usage can be recommended in this regard.
This page summarises published work. The authoritative version sits with the publisher.
DOI: 10.1093/qjmed/hcae070.087
Is something wrong with this record? Report it or request removal.
Discussion
Have you built on this work, tried to replicate it, or seen it applied in practice? Share what you know. Verified researchers and MARATTO™ domain experts can open a discussion, and any member can reply. Contributions are reviewed before they appear.
No discussion yet. Open the first thread.
New to MARATTO™? Create a free account.