MARATTO

review · The Cardiothoracic Surgeon

Perioperative outcomes and predictors of mortality after pericardiectomy for constrictive pericarditis in Africa: a systematic review and meta-analysis

2026Open accessEkiti State University

In plain language

Constrictive pericarditis is a notable cause of heart failure in Africa, primarily driven by tuberculosis. A systematic review synthesised evidence from sixteen studies across South Africa, Côte d'Ivoire, Ethiopia, Ghana, Senegal, Gabon, and Nigeria to evaluate surgical outcomes. Across eleven studies encompassing 604 patients, the pooled perioperative mortality following pericardiectomy was 10.0 per cent, with regional variations showing higher mortality in East Africa compared to Southern Africa. Presumed tuberculous or infectious aetiology was reported in 72.5 per cent of cases, but laboratory-confirmed tuberculosis was established in only 32.5 per cent, highlighting diagnostic inconsistency across healthcare facilities. Severe preoperative impairment, defined as New York Heart Association functional class IV, was consistently linked with early death. Because the underlying evidence is rated as very low certainty, standardized and prospective surgical registries are required to confirm these observations.

Key takeaways

  • Pooled perioperative mortality following pericardiectomy for constrictive pericarditis across African cohorts is approximately 10.0 per cent.
  • Presumed infectious or tuberculous causes account for 72.5 per cent of cases, whereas biologically confirmed tuberculosis represents only 32.5 per cent.
  • Preoperative New York Heart Association functional class IV is the most consistently identified predictor of early postoperative death.
  • The overall certainty of the current evidence is rated as very low, reflecting substantial heterogeneity and retrospective study designs.

Why it matters

Constrictive pericarditis is a debilitating consequence of infectious disease in Africa. Demonstrating that one in ten surgical patients dies perioperatively, especially those presenting at advanced functional stages, shows the vital importance of earlier diagnosis and treatment. Establishing clearer clinical benchmarks enables healthcare providers to evaluate surgical risk and consider whether earlier surgical referral could improve survival.

Commercialisation angle

The abstract does not indicate an application pathway.

AI-generated from the published abstract. Always read the original work before citing.

Abstract

Abstract Background Constrictive pericarditis remains a significant cause of heart failure in Africa, predominantly due to tuberculosis; however, pericardiectomy outcomes across African settings have not been systematically synthesised. This review aimed to determine the pooled perioperative mortality following pericardiectomy for constrictive pericarditis in the African population and identify predictors of early death. Methods We searched PubMed, Scopus, African Journals Online, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science from inception to May 2026, supplemented by Google Scholar and citation tracking. Two reviewers independently screened the records and extracted the data, with a third reviewer resolving any disagreements. The risk of bias was assessed using the Joanna Briggs Institute Critical Appraisal Checklist for Case Series. Perioperative mortality and aetiology were pooled using a random-effects model with Freeman-Tukey double arcsine transformation. The certainty of evidence was rated using GRADE. This systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted in accordance with the PRISMA 2020 statement. Results Of the 2148 records identified, 16 studies met the eligibility criteria and were included in the narrative synthesis, spanning South Africa, Côte d’Ivoire, Ethiopia, Ghana, Senegal, Gabon, and Nigeria. Eleven studies (604 patients) contributed to the pooled mortality analyses. The pooled perioperative mortality was 10.0% (95% confidence interval 6.5–14.0%), with substantial heterogeneity (I² = 51.5%) and evidence of funnel plot asymmetry on Egger’s test ( p = 0.004). Mortality was numerically highest in the East African cohorts (12.9%) and lowest in the Southern African cohorts (8.5%) in the subgroup analysis. In eleven studies with extractable presumed or clinically diagnosed aetiological data, the pooled proportion attributed to tuberculous or infectious aetiology was 72.5% (95% confidence interval 51.4 to 89.3%; I² = 96.4%), whereas in the nine studies reporting histology- or culture-confirmed (‘definite’) tuberculous aetiology as a distinct category, the pooled proportion was 32.5% (95% confidence interval 26.1 to 39.2%; I² = 60.9%), indicating that diagnostic certainty was a major driver of the heterogeneity in the broader aetiological estimate. Preoperative New York Heart Association functional class IV was the most consistently reported predictor of early mortality across studies. The certainty of evidence for the pooled mortality estimate was rated as very low. Conclusion Pericardiectomy for constrictive pericarditis in Africa carries a pooled perioperative mortality of approximately 10%. Tuberculous aetiology was common but highly heterogeneous in how it was diagnosed across studies, and advanced preoperative NYHA functional class IV was consistently associated with higher perioperative mortality, although this association was derived predominantly from retrospective, unadjusted, or single-study analyses. Given the very low certainty of the underlying evidence, these findings should be regarded as hypothesis-generating associations rather than established causal predictors; standardised, prospectively collected outcome data across African surgical centres are needed to determine whether earlier referral or other interventions could reduce this mortality burden. Clinical trial number Not applicable.

Research topics

  • Pericarditis and Cardiac Tamponade
  • Intraperitoneal and Appendiceal Malignancies
  • Adrenal Hormones and Disorders

Sustainable Development Goals

Read the original research

This page summarises published work. The authoritative version sits with the publisher.

DOI: 10.1186/s43057-026-00221-4

Is something wrong with this record? Report it or request removal.

Discussion

Discuss this research

Have you built on this work, tried to replicate it, or seen it applied in practice? Share what you know. Verified researchers and MARATTO™ domain experts can open a discussion, and any member can reply. Contributions are reviewed before they appear.

No discussion yet. Open the first thread.