MARATTO

article · Journal of Building Material Science

Performance of Clay-Based Earth Bricks with Varying Sand Content: A Case Study of Lendi Soil, Douala

2025Open accessUniversity of Douala

Abstract

This study evaluates the influence of sand content on the mechanical behavior and water resistance of compressed earth bricks (CEBs) manufactured from Lendi clay (Douala, Cameroon). Twenty-seven specimens (prismatic and cubic) were produced with three formulations: 0%, 30% and 60% sand substitution by dry mass, compacted at 2.5 MPa and cured for 7, 14 and 28 days. Raw material characterization included particle size distribution, sand equivalent, Atterberg limits, bulk density and Proctor compaction. The clay displayed a liquid limit of 44.07%, plastic limit of 35.23% and plasticity index of 8.84%; optimum moisture content was 15.9% and maximum dry density 1.24 g·cm⁻³. Mechanical testing showed that pure-clay bricks achieved the highest compressive and flexural strengths at all ages (up to ≈ 1.98 MPa and 0.56 MPa respectively). Although the 30% sand mix exhibited marginally higher early compressive strength (7 days), strength decreased substantially by 28 days. Capillary absorption tests revealed an important distinction: while 0% sand bricks exhibited continuous water uptake, they retained cohesion during immersion; conversely, 30% and 60% sand bricks disintegrated into a slurry within seconds of immersion, evidencing severe loss of internal bonding. These findings indicate that, for this highly plastic tropical clay, sand acts primarily as a microstructural diluent that undermines long-term cohesion and durability despite short-term packing benefits. The study underscores the need for locally tailored formulations or stabilizers when designing durable CEBs for humid tropical climates.

Research topics

  • Hygrothermal properties of building materials
  • Natural Fiber Reinforced Composites
  • Recycling and utilization of industrial and municipal waste in materials production

Read the original research

This page summarises published work. The authoritative version sits with the publisher.

DOI: 10.30564/jbms.v7i4.11853

Is something wrong with this record? Report it or request removal.

Discussion

Discuss this research

Have you built on this work, tried to replicate it, or seen it applied in practice? Share what you know. Verified researchers and MARATTO™ domain experts can open a discussion, and any member can reply. Contributions are reviewed before they appear.

No discussion yet. Open the first thread.