MARATTO

article · medRxiv

Performance Assessment of ECG Delineators on Single-Lead Wearable Ambulatory Data

2026Open accessAddis Ababa University

Abstract

Abstract Reliable interpretation of electrocardiograms (ECGs) requires precise identification of P, QRS, and T (PQRST) wave boundaries. However, it remains challenging due to noise, signal quality variability, and inherent morphological diversity particularly in recordings from children. This study systematically compares the performance of leading deep neural networks (DNN) and heuristic-based delineation algorithms on ambulatory single-lead ECG signals focusing on temporal accuracy. Experiments were conducted using the publicly available LUDB dataset and a private validation dataset comprising 21,759 annotated single-lead wave segments from 611 children recorded using KardiaMobile ECG sensor. DNN were first trained on the LUDB dataset and subsequently tested on the validation dataset. The delineation performance was assessed using Sensitivity (Se) and positive-predictive-value (P + ) metrics. The best-performing heuristic based and DNN models reached Se and P + of (98.9% vs 97.9%) for P, (99.8% vs 99.2%) for QRS, and (98.7% vs 95.9%) for T wave fiducials, respectively. The lowest standard-deviation (in ms) of wave onset/offset delineation was achieved by attention based 1DU-Net model; ±16.6/±16.3 for P-wave, ±14.0/±16.3 for QRS, and ±26.3/±18.8 for T-wave, respectively. The findings indicate that optimized heuristic models can perform comparably to complex DNN, highlighting their efficiency and suitability for real-time ECG delineation in digital health monitoring applications.

Research topics

  • ECG Monitoring and Analysis
  • Non-Invasive Vital Sign Monitoring
  • Cardiac electrophysiology and arrhythmias

Read the original research

This page summarises published work. The authoritative version sits with the publisher.

DOI: 10.64898/2026.03.24.26349185

Is something wrong with this record? Report it or request removal.

Discussion

Discuss this research

Have you built on this work, tried to replicate it, or seen it applied in practice? Share what you know. Verified researchers and MARATTO™ domain experts can open a discussion, and any member can reply. Contributions are reviewed before they appear.

No discussion yet. Open the first thread.