MARATTO

article · International Journal of Modern Education and Computer Science

Patterns and Predictors of Student Technological Proficiency in Heis: A Validated Instrument and Machine Learning Analysis

Abstract

This study examines AI-related technological proficiency among undergraduate students at the University of Casablanca and identifies the most informative indicators for prediction. Using a validated 30-item instrument covering AI applications, AI-related skills, and improvement strategies, data were collected from 600 students drawn from science and humanities programs. Overall proficiency was moderate: 63.3% of respondents met the predefined threshold, and significant group differences were observed by gender and academic specialization. For predictive modeling, correlation-based feature selection retained 17 high-value items. Two classifiers were then trained and evaluated using a 75/25 hold-out split, complemented by repeated stratified 10-fold cross-validation to assess stability. The Support Vector Classifier achieved 96.7% test accuracy with AUROC = 0.9666, while Gaussian Naïve Bayes reached 94.7% accuracy with AUROC = 0.9560; cross-validated estimates remained consistent with these results, supporting robustness. These findings indicate that a reduced set of questionnaire items can provide reliable estimates of students’ AI-related technological proficiency and can support scalable assessment and targeted interventions in higher education.

Research topics

  • Teaching and Learning Programming
  • Online Learning and Analytics
  • Psychometric Methodologies and Testing

Sustainable Development Goals

Read the original research

This page summarises published work. The authoritative version sits with the publisher.

DOI: 10.5815/ijmecs.2026.03.06

Is something wrong with this record? Report it or request removal.

Discussion

Discuss this research

Have you built on this work, tried to replicate it, or seen it applied in practice? Share what you know. Verified researchers and MARATTO™ domain experts can open a discussion, and any member can reply. Contributions are reviewed before they appear.

No discussion yet. Open the first thread.