MARATTO

article · African Journal of Empirical Research

Patient factors associated with extubation failure among neurological patients on mechanical ventilation admitted at intensive care unit at Jaramogi Oginga Odinga Teaching and Referral Hospital and Kakamega County Government Teaching and Referral Hospital

In plain language

Extubation failure in neurocritical care settings presents a substantial clinical challenge for patients recovering from mechanical ventilation. This research examined records of critically ill neurological patients who received invasive mechanical ventilation for between 24 hours and ten days across two intensive care units between March 2024 and March 2025. The investigation assessed variables such as demographics, neurological diagnosis, Glasgow Coma Scale, respiratory parameters, and airway clearance. Results show that extubation failure was primarily associated with excessive airway secretions, impaired respiratory capacity, weak cough reflexes, and extended time on mechanical ventilation. Patients who experienced failed extubation faced greater risks of aspiration, longer intensive care admissions, pneumonia, and ongoing ventilation issues. Consequently, adopting standardised readiness protocols, multidisciplinary assessments, and evidence-based practices is crucial to improve extubation success.

Key takeaways

  • Excessive airway secretions, weak cough reflexes, impaired respiratory capability, and prolonged ventilation significantly contributed to extubation failure.
  • Extubation failure was linked to increased risks of aspiration, pneumonia, and longer stays in intensive care units.
  • Standardised extubation readiness evaluations and multidisciplinary decision-making are necessary to improve clinical outcomes for mechanically ventilated neurological patients.

Why it matters

Removing a breathing tube too early in neurological patients can lead to urgent reintubation, lung infections, and extended intensive care stays. Identifying the specific patient factors that cause extubation to fail helps clinical teams refine readiness checks, lower the risk of severe complications, and ensure safer transitions off mechanical ventilation for critically ill individuals.

Commercialisation angle

This observational research provides clinical evidence that could inform the design of standardised extubation assessment protocols or decision-support software for intensive care clinicians. While the findings identify clear risk parameters, the research represents early-stage retrospective clinical evidence rather than a tested commercial product. Any resulting clinical guidelines or digital risk-stratification tools would require prospective validation and development before reaching operational healthcare markets.

AI-generated from the published abstract. Always read the original work before citing.

Abstract

Extubation for patients in neuro-critical care under mechanical ventilation is one of the most significant and critical medical interventions. The aforesaid patients may require extubation owing to the challenges that they face during weaning and removal of the tube when compared to their counterparts in intensive care. The problem for the nuero-critical-based patients under mechanical ventilation is often due to an upsurge in secretion production, difficulties in speech and swallowing capability, weak airway capacity and stiff breathing control. The risk of extubation failure continues to be a major concern in neurocritical care settings. This complication occurs when patients require the breathing tube to be reinserted within 72 hours after it was intentionally removed, indicating that the initial attempt to discontinue mechanical ventilation was unsuccessful with failed extubation among neurological patients admitted to intensive care units. This study employed a analytical cross-sectional design using quantitative approaches to identify significant patient factors associated with extubation failure. Retrospectively, the study conducted chart review of patient files of critically ill neurological patients admitted to the Intensive Care Unit ICU between March 2024 to March 2025, subjected to invasive mechanical ventilation between 24 hours and 10 days. Data were collected on patient demographics, neurological diagnosis, Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS), duration of mechanical ventilation, respiratory parameters, airway clearance ability, secretion burden, and amongst others. The findings indicate that extubation failure remains a common and serious challenge in neurocritical care settings. The notable contributing factors included excessive airway secretions, difficulty in the resipiratory capability, weak cough reflexes and prolonged ventilator exposure. The patients who experienced extubation failure had higher inclinations to aspiration, longer ICU exposure, and pneumonia and ventilator support challenges. The study thus concludes that standardized extubation readiness evaluation, professional patient selection, multi-disciplinary decision-making plus effective post-extubation assessment are needed to deal with extubation failure among neurological patients. Further, the use of evidence-based and research-oriented extubation practice is vital for patients under mechanical ventilation. This study thus recommends that evidence-based extubation failure should be practiced more effectively in hospitals.

Research topics

  • Respiratory Support and Mechanisms
  • Nosocomial Infections in ICU
  • Intensive Care Unit Cognitive Disorders

Sustainable Development Goals

Read the original research

This page summarises published work. The authoritative version sits with the publisher.

DOI: 10.51867/ajernet.7.3.90

Is something wrong with this record? Report it or request removal.

Discussion

Discuss this research

Have you built on this work, tried to replicate it, or seen it applied in practice? Share what you know. Verified researchers and MARATTO™ domain experts can open a discussion, and any member can reply. Contributions are reviewed before they appear.

No discussion yet. Open the first thread.