article · Global Health Action
= 11) were gender specific. Participatory approaches complemented gender programming by creating spaces for reflection, adaptation and power-shifting, strengthening participant agency and local buy-in. Most initiatives achieved change at individual or community levels, with limited structural or policy impact. Partnership dynamics were infrequently described. Power dynamics were cross-cutting determinants of project functioning across contextual levels. This review highlights the potential for participatory processes to shift gendered power relations if embedded in inclusive, reflective, and equitably resourced collaboration. Better understanding of partnership processes and synergies between gender integration and participatory design could support future projects advancing gender equality for health.
This page summarises published work. The authoritative version sits with the publisher.
DOI: 10.1080/16549716.2026.2627106
Is something wrong with this record? Report it or request removal.
Discussion
Have you built on this work, tried to replicate it, or seen it applied in practice? Share what you know. Verified researchers and MARATTO™ domain experts can open a discussion, and any member can reply. Contributions are reviewed before they appear.
No discussion yet. Open the first thread.
New to MARATTO™? Create a free account.