MARATTO

article · Advances in Civil Engineering

Partial Replacement of Cement by Waste Paper Pulp Ash and Its Effect on Concrete Properties

202221 citationsOpen accessDebre Berhan University

In plain language

This research evaluates the use of waste paper pulp ash as a partial replacement for cement in concrete production. Concrete mixtures were prepared for 25 MPa target strength by substituting ordinary Portland cement (OPC) and Portland pozzolana cement (PPC) with 0%, 5%, 10%, and 15% waste paper pulp ash. Testing revealed that replacing 5% of OPC with this ash produced the highest compressive strength across all curing periods, reaching 36.83 MPa at 28 days. Conversely, all replacement levels in PPC reduced compressive strength compared to the control mix. Increasing the ash content led to higher water absorption in the concrete. However, blended concretes using either OPC or PPC combined with waste paper pulp ash showed improved resistance to a 2% sulfuric acid solution compared to the control mix. The substitution lowers concrete costs and conserves raw materials.

Key takeaways

  • A 5% replacement of ordinary Portland cement with waste paper pulp ash achieved the highest compressive strength across 3, 7, and 28 days.
  • Replacing Portland pozzolana cement with waste paper pulp ash reduced compressive strength at all tested replacement levels.
  • Water absorption increased as the proportion of waste paper pulp ash in the mix increased.
  • Blends containing waste paper pulp ash demonstrated superior resistance to a 2% sulfuric acid solution compared to the control concrete.
  • Using waste paper pulp ash lowers concrete production costs and conserves raw materials.

Why it matters

Traditional cement production consumes high volumes of natural raw materials and entails significant production costs. Identifying viable industrial or post-consumer waste substitutes, such as paper pulp ash, helps address waste management challenges while creating more acid-resistant concrete mixes. This approach offers a route to lower the material costs of concrete without sacrificing strength when used at specific replacement ratios.

Commercialisation angle

This work is an applied laboratory evaluation relevant to concrete manufacturers and construction material suppliers seeking cheaper, recycled alternatives to ordinary Portland cement. By demonstrating that a 5% replacement of OPC reduces costs while improving both strength and sulfuric acid resistance, the findings offer an initial formulation benchmark. However, the study remains at an applied testing stage, requiring broader structural trials and durability evaluations prior to commercial deployment.

AI-generated from the published abstract. Always read the original work before citing.

Abstract

An investigation was conducted to study the viability of using waste paper pulp ash as an alternative material applied as a partial replacement of cement in the manufacturing of concrete and its effect on the properties of concrete, and also, the cost and environmental advantage of using waste paper were examined. Four concrete mixes with 0%, 5%, 10%, and 15% waste paper pulp ash replacement of OPC and PPC for 25 MPa concrete were prepared. Based on the results obtained from the research, the highest compressive strength obtained at all test ages, i.e., 3, 7, and 28 days, were, 24.36, 28.35, and 36.83 MPa, respectively, with 5% replacement of waste paper pulp ash for OPC, and for PPC, all percentage replacements showed reduction in compressive strength than the control mix. The water absorption of concrete was increased with increasing the percentage of waste paper pulp ash than control concrete. The control concrete clearly has the lowest resistance to 2% sulfuric acid solution compared to blended concrete of OPC‐WPPA and PPC‐WPPA. The cost comparison indicates that the incorporation of waste paper pulp ash decreases the cost of concrete and WPPA and saves raw materials used in cement and concrete production.

Research topics

  • Recycled Aggregate Concrete Performance
  • Recycling and Waste Management Techniques

Read the original research

This page summarises published work. The authoritative version sits with the publisher.

DOI: 10.1155/2022/8880196

Is something wrong with this record? Report it or request removal.

Discussion

Discuss this research

Have you built on this work, tried to replicate it, or seen it applied in practice? Share what you know. Verified researchers and MARATTO™ domain experts can open a discussion, and any member can reply. Contributions are reviewed before they appear.

No discussion yet. Open the first thread.