MARATTO

article · Edelweiss Applied Science and Technology

Parametric optimization of passive envelope design under 2020 and 2050 climate conditions: A case study of Marrakech

2026Open accessMohammed V University

Abstract

This study evaluates the thermal performance of passive building envelope strategies under current (2020) and future (2050 under Representative Concentration Pathway 8.5) climate conditions in Marrakech, a hot semi-arid city facing increasing cooling demand. Glazing types, including tinted glazing (AL-Tinted) and low-emissivity glazing (Low-E), are used in building envelopes, along with phase change materials (PCM). A dynamic simulation approach was employed to assess 27 configurations combining different levels of expanded polystyrene (EPS) insulation, glazing types including tinted glazing (AL-Tinted) and low-emissivity glazing (Low-E) used in building envelopes, and phase change materials (PCM). Results indicate that in 2020, the most insulated configuration (EPS 10 cm + Low-E glazing + 4 cm PCM) reduced cooling demand by 62.7% but increased heating demand by 76.9%. Under future climate conditions, a configuration with moderate insulation (EPS 4 cm), Low-E glazing, and 4 cm PCM achieved the highest cooling reduction (−65.8%) while avoiding overheating. Configurations without insulation led to significant heating penalties exceeding +100%. The influence of envelope parameters shifts under climate change, with insulation dominating current performance and PCM becoming more significant in future scenarios. The findings highlight the need for climate-responsive design strategies, supporting a transition from insulation-driven approaches to adaptive combinations of glazing and thermal storage for hot climates.

Research topics

  • Building Energy and Comfort Optimization
  • Phase Change Materials Research
  • Urban Heat Island Mitigation

Sustainable Development Goals

Read the original research

This page summarises published work. The authoritative version sits with the publisher.

DOI: 10.55214/2576-8484.v10i4.12790

Is something wrong with this record? Report it or request removal.

Discussion

Discuss this research

Have you built on this work, tried to replicate it, or seen it applied in practice? Share what you know. Verified researchers and MARATTO™ domain experts can open a discussion, and any member can reply. Contributions are reviewed before they appear.

No discussion yet. Open the first thread.