MARATTO

article · Frontiers in Medicine

Oxygen blenders for prevention of retinopathy of prematurity are highly cost-effective in Uganda

2026Open accessUniversity of Kisubi

Abstract

Blended oxygen has been shown to reduce severe retinopathy of prematurity (ROP) incidence worldwide, and more recently in Uganda. Although it has been established that ROP-driven visual impairment has a substantial societal burden and that screening and treatment programs are cost-effective in low- and middle-income countries, there is limited evidence for the economic impact of prevention with appropriate oxygen management equipment (OME) in these regions. We performed a cost-utility analysis of OME implementation comparing variations ranging between most and least favorable values. Disability-adjusted life years (DALYs) were calculated with a 3% discount rate. Calculations assumed a 62.1% incidence of visual impairment in untreated severe ROP and a disability weight of 0.184 for severe visual impairment due to ROP. One set of OME costs between $677.50-$1,844.11 USD in Uganda. We found that the cost to prevent one case of ROP-driven severe visual impairment in Uganda ranges from $25.55-$543.99, with a base case (best estimate) of $168.92 per case averted. This reflects 5.18 DALYs averted over the 58-year average Ugandan lifespan and a cost of $4.97-$104.98 to avert one DALY, with a base case of $32.60 per DALY averted. In comparison, prevention of malaria via mosquito net distribution was estimated in a 2020 meta-analysis to cost $50 for every DALY averted. The high-end estimate is roughly 10% of the annual gross domestic product per capita ($1,002.30). Therefore, OME is a cost-effective means to prevent severe visual impairment among infants in Uganda. Implementation of OME in Uganda would also reflect a clear ethical and humanitarian success.

Research topics

  • Retinopathy of Prematurity Studies
  • Neonatal Respiratory Health Research
  • Preterm Birth and Chorioamnionitis

Read the original research

This page summarises published work. The authoritative version sits with the publisher.

DOI: 10.3389/fmed.2026.1715127

Is something wrong with this record? Report it or request removal.

Discussion

Discuss this research

Have you built on this work, tried to replicate it, or seen it applied in practice? Share what you know. Verified researchers and MARATTO™ domain experts can open a discussion, and any member can reply. Contributions are reviewed before they appear.

No discussion yet. Open the first thread.