MARATTO

article · Medical Research Archives

Optimizing Prophylactic Anticoagulation in Burns is Associated with Low Incidence of Venous Thromboembolic Complications

20232 citationsOpen accessUniversity of Tunis El Manar

Abstract

Venous thromboembolism (VTE) complications in burn patients are often under-diagnosed and potentially serious. Thromboprophylaxis in this population remains controversial. Objective: Assess the impact of optimizing prophylactic anticoagulation with enoxaparin in burn patients on the incidence of venous thromboembolism (VTE). Methods: Case-control study conducted in intensive burn care department in Tunisia during 24 months, (February 2018- February 2020). Patients were divided into 2 groups according to the prophylactic anticoagulation modalities: - G1 (Equation) receiving enoxaparine en mg/12H = 22.8 + (3.3 × % TBSA/10) + (1.89 × (weight in kg)/10)) - G2 (No équation) receiving enoxaparine at a dose of 0.5mg/kg, twice daily The goal of prophylactic antifactor Xa level was 0.2- 0.4 IU/ml Results: During study period, 216 patients were included divided into 2 groups: G1 (n= 108) et G2 (n= 108). The groups were comparable in terms of sex, age, weight, burned skin surface and VTE risk. Also, severity of the 2 groups was comparable regarding: smoke inhalation (p=0.46), use of mechanical ventilation (p=0.22), use of catecholamines within 48 hours (p=0.56) and rescue incision (p=0.77). In the equation group, initial dose of enoxaparin was 0.42± 0.12 mg. Target anti Xa was reached at the 1st dosage in 55 patients 55 (50.9%). The median final dose of enoxaparin required to reach the anti Xa target was 52 mg every 12 hours (range, 35-69 mg). No episodes of bleeding, thrombocytopenia, or heparin allergy were documented in either group. The incidence of VTE complications was higher in group 2 than in group 1 (8.3% versus 3.7%; p=0.001 with an OR=1.6 and CI [0.47-1.03]). The length of stay was longer for G2 with a significant difference (30 days vs 22 days; p=0.001). Mortality was the same for two groups. Conclusion: Optimizing thromboprophylaxis in severely burned patients with enoxaparin, using the enoxaparin dosing eqauation allows to achieve prophylactic anti-Xa level and to reduce risk of VTE complications.

Research topics

  • Burn Injury Management and Outcomes
  • COVID-19 and healthcare impacts
  • Venous Thromboembolism Diagnosis and Management

Sustainable Development Goals

Read the original research

This page summarises published work. The authoritative version sits with the publisher.

DOI: 10.18103/mra.v11i6.3960

Is something wrong with this record? Report it or request removal.

Discussion

Discuss this research

Have you built on this work, tried to replicate it, or seen it applied in practice? Share what you know. Verified researchers and MARATTO™ domain experts can open a discussion, and any member can reply. Contributions are reviewed before they appear.

No discussion yet. Open the first thread.