MARATTO

article · Buildings

Optimizing of Self-Compacting Concrete (SCC): Synergistic Impact of Marble and Limestone Powders—A Technical and Statistical Analysis

20257 citationsOpen accessUniversity Ferhat Abbas of Setif

Abstract

The disposal and recycling of industrial by-products such as marble and limestone powders pose pressing environmental challenges due to the substantial amounts of waste generated annually by marble processing plants and limestone quarries. The integration of these by-products into concrete production is justified by their widespread availability and the potential to alleviate the environmental burden. This study used a statistical mixture design approach to systematically assess the effects of limestone and marble powders, with varying fineness levels, as partial cement replacements (up to 17%) on the rheological and mechanical properties of self-compacting concrete (SCC). The experimental findings revealed that the density of the SCC mixtures ranged from 2475 to 2487 kg/m3. Mixtures incorporating limestone powder exhibited superior flowability, achieving a slump flow of up to 69 cm, an 8% improvement compared to those containing marble powder. However, marble powder with a specific surface area of 330 m2/kg demonstrated significant improvements in compressive and tensile strengths, with increases of 18%. Statistical analysis using analysis of variance (ANOVA) validated the reliability of the predictive models developed, which demonstrated coefficients of determination (R2) that exceeded 0.94 and p-values below 0.05. These models enable precise predictions of critical performance metrics, including density, slump flow, box flow, compressive strength, and tensile strength, thus reducing the need for extensive experimental procedures.

Research topics

  • Concrete and Cement Materials Research
  • Innovative concrete reinforcement materials
  • Innovations in Concrete and Construction Materials

Read the original research

This page summarises published work. The authoritative version sits with the publisher.

DOI: 10.3390/buildings15071043

Is something wrong with this record? Report it or request removal.

Discussion

Discuss this research

Have you built on this work, tried to replicate it, or seen it applied in practice? Share what you know. Verified researchers and MARATTO™ domain experts can open a discussion, and any member can reply. Contributions are reviewed before they appear.

No discussion yet. Open the first thread.