MARATTO

article · SVU-International Journal of Medical Sciences

Optimizing MRI Detection of Recurrence in Head and Neck Cancer: The Clinical Impact of NI-RADS Post-Treatment

Abstract

Background: Head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) are associated with high recurrence rates, necessitating effective post-treatment surveillance to improve patient outcomes.Objectives: This study evaluates the role of Neck Imaging Reporting and Data System (NI-RADS) Scores in predicting disease recurrence in patients with HNSCC.Patients and methods: This retrospective cohort study included patients diagnosed with HNSCC. Demographic, clinical, and treatment-related data were collected, with MRI findings and NI-RADS scores used to assess recurrence. MRI findings such as T1- and T2-weighted imaging and diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) and contrast study were analyzed for their role in detecting residual or recurrent disease.Results: The study involved 120 patients with treated head and neck cancer, with an average age of 59 years, predominantly male (80.8%). The most common primary tumor sites were the larynx, oral cavity, and hypopharynx. Tumor stages ranged from I-IV, with 30% at stage II and 55% being moderate grade. NI-RADS scores showed 41.7% classified as NI-RADS 1 and 30.8% as higher-risk NI-RADS 3. Treatment included chemotherapy, surgery, and combinations, with 31.7% receiving both chemotherapy and radiotherapy. And MRI findings correlated with NI-RADS classifications, showing higher recurrence rates for higher NI-RADS categories, especially NI-RADS 2b, 3, and 4, with statistically significant differences (p < 0.001).Conclusion: Higher NI-RADS scores were associated with higher recurrence rates, particularly in primary sites and lymph nodes. NI-RADS MRI serves as a reliable tool for risk stratification and decision-making in post-treatment surveillance.

Research topics

  • Radiomics and Machine Learning in Medical Imaging
  • Brain Tumor Detection and Classification
  • Head and Neck Cancer Studies

Sustainable Development Goals

Read the original research

This page summarises published work. The authoritative version sits with the publisher.

DOI: 10.21608/svuijm.2025.370404.2151

Is something wrong with this record? Report it or request removal.

Discussion

Discuss this research

Have you built on this work, tried to replicate it, or seen it applied in practice? Share what you know. Verified researchers and MARATTO™ domain experts can open a discussion, and any member can reply. Contributions are reviewed before they appear.

No discussion yet. Open the first thread.