MARATTO

article · Journal of Thermoplastic Composite Materials

Optimizing mechanical performance and water absorption behavior of silica-reinforced recycled thermoplastic composites for rooftile applications

Abstract

This investigation was conducted to synthesize and characterize sustainable composite materials for construction applications—specifically roof tiles—by utilizing recycled thermoplastics (HDPE, PP, PET) reinforced with silica sand microparticles. This methodology offers the dual advantage of mitigating plastic-waste accumulation and providing a cost-effective alternative to conventional, resource-intensive construction materials. Employing a Taguchi L9 orthogonal array, the study systematically optimized the effects of thermoplastic type, filler weight fraction (30–50 wt.%), and particle size (150–450 µm) on mechanical performance and moisture-ingress resistance. Experimental analysis revealed that the composite comprising HDPE, 30 wt.% silica, and 150 µm particles (A1B1C1) exhibited superior energy-absorption capacity (impact strength: 5.83 J) and minimal water absorption (0.15%). Conversely, the most favorable mechanical integrity was achieved with the PET, 50 wt.% silica, and 300 µm particle configuration (A3B3C2), which maximized hardness (60.8 HRB), compressive strength (57.9 MPa), and flexural strength (49.56 MPa). Multi-response optimization via Grey Relational Analysis (GRA) confirmed that the A3B3C2 combination provided the most robust overall solution, yielding a maximum Grey Relational Grade of 0.833. Consequently, the successful fabrication of these optimized recycled thermoplastic composites demonstrates their strong potential for real-world use in roof-tile production, thereby supporting a more sustainable and resource-efficient construction industry.

Research topics

  • Natural Fiber Reinforced Composites
  • Innovative concrete reinforcement materials
  • Concrete and Cement Materials Research

Sustainable Development Goals

Read the original research

This page summarises published work. The authoritative version sits with the publisher.

DOI: 10.1177/08927057261425893

Is something wrong with this record? Report it or request removal.

Discussion

Discuss this research

Have you built on this work, tried to replicate it, or seen it applied in practice? Share what you know. Verified researchers and MARATTO™ domain experts can open a discussion, and any member can reply. Contributions are reviewed before they appear.

No discussion yet. Open the first thread.