MARATTO

book chapter · Advances in bioinformatics and biomedical engineering book series

Optimizing Evidence

Abstract

Randomization stands as a pivotal component of clinical trial methodology, ensuring unbiased treatment allocation and robust study outcomes. However, its application raises significant ethical considerations that demand careful examination to uphold research ethics and safeguard participant rights. In this study, we explore the ethical implications of randomization in clinical trials, drawing insights from original references. Through a comprehensive analysis, we delineate key ethical issues surrounding randomization, including equitable treatment allocation, informed consent, participant autonomy, and the balance between scientific rigor and participant welfare. By elucidating these ethical dimensions, this study contributes to the ongoing discourse on research ethics and underscores the importance of ethical considerations in shaping the conduct and interpretation of clinical trials.

Research topics

  • Meta-analysis and systematic reviews
  • Clinical practice guidelines implementation
  • Colorectal Cancer Screening and Detection

Sustainable Development Goals

Read the original research

This page summarises published work. The authoritative version sits with the publisher.

DOI: 10.4018/979-8-3693-2655-8.ch010

Is something wrong with this record? Report it or request removal.

Discussion

Discuss this research

Have you built on this work, tried to replicate it, or seen it applied in practice? Share what you know. Verified researchers and MARATTO™ domain experts can open a discussion, and any member can reply. Contributions are reviewed before they appear.

No discussion yet. Open the first thread.